AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Susan Godwin

MATH815 · MATH37 · MATH120 · GEOM120 · MATH110A · MATH110 · MATH130 · 39 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
90%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you show up, stay on ALEKS, and ask questions when the pace picks up.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring math instructorALEKS heavy homeworkFast lecturesExtra credit opportunitiesSkip class and you struggle
  • and genuine care, especially in MATH110.
  • but and grades.
  • A minority , and dropouts in higher courses.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

A is reachable if you do ALEKS and use reviews or cheat sheets, but and .

Nearly all grade-effort evidence is in person; the one online review reported an A+ with steady work.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content is standard college math; difficulty spikes with pace and course level rather than pure concept density.

Online MATH120 felt easier; in-person MATH130 and some MATH120 sections felt fast and hard.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and tags repeatedly warn that skipping means you will not pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

About 90% would take again and praise outweighs complaints for students who put in consistent work.

The sole online review is strongly positive; critical minority.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

and clear criteria help, but several call her a .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

ALEKS or weekly homework, workshops, quizzes, and .

Format shift

Online .

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

, and care; minority report rushed unclear teaching.

Format shift

Online review is strongly positive; in-person quality is mixed but leans good.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Homework and quizzes matter, but midterms and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

38 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In , and even the best math instructor they had, while others say she lectures too fast, grades hard, or leaves weak students behind.

Main concern

Heavy ALEKS or ; pace can feel too fast for weaker math backgrounds.

What students said

“The . If you pay attention and do your work, you will pass.”
MATH110
“She goes way too fast and . All her notes are just practice problems with .”
MATH130
“Uses ALEKS. Gives ton of opportunities for .”
MATH110

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Single online MATH120 review calls her thorough, caring, and a 10/10 with and .

Main concern

Only one online review exists, so format-specific patterns are thin.

What students said

“Prof Godwin was a great professor, she explained the lessons very thoroughly and you can tell that she really wants her students to succeed.”
MATH120

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; some courses allow a small cheat sheet and reviews that mirror tests.

In-person testsIndex card cheat sheet sometimes allowedReview sheet often matches testHomework quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; some allow a 3x5 cheat sheet and review content that appears on exams.

In-person testsCheat sheet allowed in some termsReview sheet maps to test
“Allows a 3X5 index card cheat sheet (highly recommend hand-written over typed) for exams.”
MATH110
“Reviews test and what's on the review is on the test.”
MATH815

Online

One online review mentions two tests and a .

Two tests and a final
“Theres 2 tests, a final, 4 sections of , and a discussion every other week or something like that.”
MATH120

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The . If you pay attention and do your work, you will pass.”

Voice snapshots generated from 39 reviews spanning 2006-2021, weighting repeated themes on care, ALEKS workload, and lecture pace. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“She will help you fully understand mathematical concepts during class, just ask away!”

👍 Recommendation Rate

78/100

“10/10 take her class”

📚 Workload Reality

35/100

“uses ALEKS for but helps you to grasp the material well”

⚡ Pace Concerns

40/100

“Goes way too fast. Does not care if .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She explained the lessons very thoroughly
  • She is mellow and all about teaching us
  • Lectures are more clear than the book most of the time

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Easy class easy pass
  • Be sure to be thorough on note taking during lectures, because
  • Gives ton of opportunities for

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Cares about her students and makes sure you learn
  • SHE'S A SPLENDED PROFESSOR VERY PROFESSIONAL AND NICE
  • she never made me feel stupid for asking any questions

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

39

Recent reviews read by the AI

39

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

39 reviews span many years with rich detail and mixed but , and pace.

Inside 39 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 525
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 56

Course coverage

MATH11013 reviews
MATH12013 reviews
MATH1307 reviews
GEOM1202 reviews
MATH8152 reviews
Show 2 more courses
MATH110A1 review
MATH371 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 4