AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Dennis Law

CHEM1 · CHEM2 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.2/5
Take again
11.11%
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

Avoid unless and tolerate tough grading with messy scheduling.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderTest HeavyScattered DeadlinesSelf-Teach RequiredLecture Heavy
  • Most students say he does not teach well and .
  • , and , and poorly aligned.
  • ; several students dropped or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

Hard workers report A is effectively , and test-heavy structure.

; in-person comments are especially stark about impossible As.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

Heavy lecture and material feel punishing to learn.

Online and ; in-person adds pop quizzes and long rushed lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

, while others list attendance as no or not provided.

; in-person tags more often stress presence.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

About 11% would take again and most comments say .

and in person, with only one milder online review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

and hard workers saying As were made impossible.

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

20/100

Lots of , and expensive ALEKS add constant pressure.

Format shift

Online stresses locked HW and scattered schedules; , and 3-hour lectures.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Students say he reads PowerPoints, uses other teachers' recordings, and .

Format shift

Online quality is especially low due to prerecorded material; in-person lectures are called boring and rushed.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Weekly quizzes, pop quizzes, and .

Format shift

Exam and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews describe rushed 3-hour lectures, pop quizzes, test-heavy load, ALEKS costs, and .

Main concern

Strict pacing and for hard workers.

What students said

“Terrible class! As a student who works very hard to receive A's, professor Law made this impossible.”
CHEM2
“Gives long boring lectures legit for 3 hours because he rushes the slides”
CHEM2
“Law does not teach the material, he practically reads of the powerpoints.”
CHEM2

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections use prerecorded lectures , and heavy self-study.

Main concern

Engagement is weak and , so you cannot review wrong answers.

What students said

“His lectures and labs are pre recorded from another teacher. and and poorly planned.”
CHEM2
“I found myself relying on YouTube and study apps to prepare for tests because HW would be locked with wrong answer unavailable for .”
CHEM2
“We've had to teach ourselves by dumb little videos he posts, which arent educational at all”
CHEM1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and frequent quizzes are central, often without study guides and with .

Test heavyWeekly quizzesPop quizzesNo study guidesScattered exam schedule

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments emphasize weekly or , and little review before exams.

Weekly quizzesPop quizzesTest heavyNo study guides
“ and if forgotten, two would be given the next week. There are no study guides or but one.”
CHEM2
“Quizes every week”
CHEM2

Online

Online students report and homework timing and locked HW answers before tests; .

Scattered exam scheduleLocked HW before examsPrerecorded labs
“ and and poorly planned.”
CHEM2
“HW would be locked with wrong answer unavailable for .”
CHEM2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Terrible class! As a student who works very hard to receive A's, professor Law made this impossible.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, , and . Credibility rating: High.

💥 Teaching Disaster

15/100

“Law does not teach the material, he practically reads of the powerpoints.”

🚫

12/100

“ ”

📚

20/100

“I found myself relying on YouTube and study apps to prepare for tests”

⚖️

18/100

“professor Law made this impossible”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures and
  • Gives long boring lectures legit for 3 hours straight
  • he practically reads of the powerpoints

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • We both ended up dropping the class

Theme 3

📅 About Organization

  • and and poorly planned
  • Due dates were scattered and the chapter
  • the most random due dates

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Nine detailed reviews from 2018-2021 with highly consistent low quality scores and matching complaints across formats.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 58

Course coverage

CHEM28 reviews
CHEM11 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1