AI Rate Professor

Art

Carol Roemer

ART4 · ANTHR70255 · ART1H · ART11 · ART9 · ART1 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
62.5%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you love art history and will study hard; skip if you want an easy GE.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerAmazing lecturesExtra creditCookies and coffeeStrict writingPassionate
  • Passionate university-level art history lectures that many call life-changing.
  • , and test-heavy structure; not a light GE.
  • and caring personality help serious students pass.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

helps, but and notes, and some call it graduate-level work.

; the one online review is very negative on fairness.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Many rate difficulty 4-5 with long lectures, heavy writing, and fast slides; a minority call ART1 easy.

In-person dominates difficulty evidence; online single review also rates difficulty 5.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

and old-school show-up expectations.

In-person strongly mandatory; online also marked yes in the sole review.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

About 62% take-again with polarized love-or-hate comments depending on art interest and work tolerance.

In-person is mixed-positive; the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

Lots of and wants students to pass, but tough on grammar and writing quality.

Format shift

In-person mentions plus strict reports; .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Reading, handouts, essays, museum visits, and .

Format shift

In-person workload complaints are common; .

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Many call lectures amazing and university-level; .

Format shift

; online experience is poor in the one review.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Test-heavy with essays and reports; study guides and notes are key.

Format shift

; online also exam-focused with writing scrutiny.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person students split between jewel-level lecturer praise and complaints of heavy workload and and coffee.

Main concern

High workload for a GE and strict grammar on reports.

What students said

“She is a real jewel and whoever can taker her class is lucky to learn from her.”
ART1
“She is old school - expects , and study hard.”
ART1
“Dont be fooled this class is TOUGH.”
ART4

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and exams covering untaught content.

Main concern

Online organization and writing strictness reportedly lead to unfair Fs.

What students said

“Mrs Roemer was a very unorganized teacher and rude. over in class.”
ART1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Expect ; doable with notes and reading, not open-book style.

Test heavyEssays and reportsStudy guidesMuseum visit

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and study guides; essays and projects also count.

Tests from reading and notesEssaysExtra credit
“The tests are not bad if you do the and study guides, and .”
ART1
“As long as .”
ART1

Online

One online review says exams included content not covered in class and writing is graded very strictly.

Strict writingExams with uncovered content
“ over in class. Be aware”
ART1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Roemer is amazing! She is a real jewel and whoever can taker her class is lucky to learn from her. She is university level.”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews (16 in-person, 1 online), capturing polarized lecture love versus workload and strictness. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Lecture Excellence

85/100

“What a pleasure to sit and listen to her lectures. One of the .”

📚 Heavy Workload

28/100

“This class was way too much work for a G.E. class.”

🍪 Care &

78/100

“she offers lots of and wants you to pass the class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Terrific lecturer, makes the subject come alive
  • Passionate teacher

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Dont be fooled this class is TOUGH
  • expects , and study hard
  • If you are majoring in Art history than this class if for you

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • The best and sweetest professor
  • Nice teacher who puts cookies and coffee out
  • she honestly cares if you are serious about the class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen reviews over a long span with detailed polarized opinions and .

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ART112 reviews
ANTHR702551 review
ART111 review
ART1H1 review
ART41 review
Show 1 more courses
ART91 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 2 · A 4

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1