AI Rate Professor

Web Development

Elevila Thompson

COSW30 · COSW10 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Prefer her in person if possible; online sections currently look unreliable for communication and support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor online communicationProject-basedFormat-dependentSlow repliesClear criteria when present
  • Online COSW10 reviews slam slow replies, broken module files, and .
  • One in-person COSW30 review , and a favorite professor.
  • Grades can be easy to obtain, but students seeking real skill growth feel under-challenged online.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Students report A grades even with mediocre work and without finishing the textbook.

Easy A noted mainly in online reviews; praise.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

Winter online pace is faster, but content ; difficulty ratings stay moderate.

; limited in-person data.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews ; online format implies limited seat-time requirements.

comments.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Two of three reviews would not take her again due to communication failures online.

Online strongly negative; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

80/100

Students earn A grades while feeling the grade outpaces skill growth; .

Format shift

but thin on feedback; .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Lots of homework and .

Format shift

Online tags lots of homework; in-person workload not detailed.

Teaching experience

Poor

40/100

Online delivery and communication draw sharp criticism; one in-person student found her excellent.

Format shift

Online poor communication; .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Projects and ; little mention of formal exams.

Format shift

Online is project and module based; exams not clearly described.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Single COSW30 , and care for student success.

Main concern

, so confidence is limited.

What students said

“She really cares for her students' success and and ”
COSW30

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online COSW10: slow communication, corrupt module files, heavy reading with .

Main concern

Days-long reply times, locked/corrupt files, and .

What students said

“not great at (if she does)”
COSW10
“files/examples were corrupt/locked on her modules”
COSW10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on projects and .

Project-basedModule assignmentsLimited exam detail

Assessment risk

Varies

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person COSW30 .

Online

Online COSW10 centers on projects and readings; .

ProjectsModule filesLittle exam detail
“I stopped reading and was ”
COSW10

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is easily one of . She really cares for her students' success and and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews (2 online, 1 in-person), highlighting a sharp format split. Credibility rating: Low.

📡 Online Communication Issues

25/100

“She is SO bad at communication though, files/examples were corrupt/locked on her modules”

🎯 Format Split

40/100

“Super communicative and quick to answer questions”

📈

82/100

“Doesn't feel like I deserve the grade... ”

Theme 1

💻 About Online Experience

  • (if she does)
  • files/examples were corrupt/locked on her modules
  • Doesn't update gradebook regularly

Theme 2

🏫

  • easily one of
  • and
  • Super communicative and quick to answer questions

Theme 3

📈 About Grades & Work

  • Doesn't feel like I deserve the grade
  • The textbook isn't actually required
  • lots of

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only 3 reviews, split by format and conflicting strongly between online and in-person experiences.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

COSW102 reviews
COSW301 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1