AI Rate Professor

Communication

Laura Michel

COMM60 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless you can absorb a costly unused textbook and strict late penalties with little flexibility.

Best fit · Budget FirstHarsh late penaltyTextbook wasteClear grading criteriaGives good feedbackNot recommended
  • Forced textbook purchase that was barely used feels like a money waste.
  • Harsh late penalties during pandemic hardships drove strong frustration.
  • and , but overall quality rating is very low.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Student earned a B under harsh late penalties and saw little path to an easy A.

Evidence comes only from one In person review.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Difficulty rated moderate; complaints focus more on cost and late policy than pure content complexity.

Evidence comes only from one In person review.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

85/100

as not mandatory.

Evidence comes only from one In person review.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

and framed policies as stupid and ridiculous.

Evidence comes only from one In person review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Harsh late penalty and overall low quality experience point to inflexible, student-unfriendly grading.

Format shift

Based on In person evidence only.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

, but late penalties and unused textbook costs sour the load experience.

Format shift

Based on In person evidence only.

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

Quality rated 1/5 with strong frustration over textbook use and pandemic-era late policy.

Format shift

Based on In person evidence only.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly weight exams versus assignments; late work policy is the .

Format shift

Based on In person evidence only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Budget First

In-person COMM60 felt unfair on cost and late work; .

Main concern

Required textbook rarely used plus harsh late penalties during already hard times.

What students said

“She made us buy a textbook that we hardly used, it's a waste of money just make PDF's to re-use each semester.”
COMM60

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

review.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She made us buy a textbook that we hardly used, it's a waste of money just make PDF's to re-use each semester. Harsh late penalty which is stupid and ridiculous during a pandemic”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 In person review, highlighting cost waste and late-penalty frustration. Credibility rating: Low.

💸 Textbook Cost Frustration

20/100

“She made us buy a textbook that we hardly used, it's a waste of money just make PDF's to re-use each semester.”

⏰ Harsh Late Penalty

22/100

“Harsh late penalty which is stupid and ridiculous during a pandemic when all students are already facing hardships”

👎 Recommendation

15/100

“No”

Theme 1

💰 About Cost & Materials

  • textbook that we hardly used, it's a waste of money
  • just make PDF's to re-use each semester

Theme 2

⚖️ About Policies

  • Harsh late penalty which is stupid and ridiculous during a pandemic
  • I suggest to get rid of late penalties for now

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Single In person review with but no multi-student consensus or long time span.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

COMM601 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values