AI Rate Professor

Languages

Janet Rohman

ASL1 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want a caring ASL teacher and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and funnyHeavy ASL practiceLots of homeworkPatient with tech issuesParticipation matters
  • Three of four reviews call her sweet, funny, fair, and great for learning ASL.
  • Workload is high with lots of , and practice signing.
  • One online review warns of 18-plus weekly tasks and says run.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

As are common with effort, but tough-grader and massive practice loads mean an A is not free.

Online includes a ; in person reports fair grading with heavy study.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

ASL demands constant vocab, fingerspelling, and practice, reflected in mid-to-high difficulty ratings.

Both formats stress heavy practice; online overload is sharper in one review.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

In person attendance is mandatory; .

Online ; in person is clearly mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

75/100

Three of and praise her as wonderful for ASL learning.

In person is strongly positive; online .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Most call her fair and caring, though one .

Format shift

Online ; in person stresses fairness.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Lots of , and one claim of 18-plus weekly assignments.

Format shift

Online overload is extreme in one review; in person also reports lots of homework.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

Majority rate her 5/5 as funny, caring, patient, and effective for ASL.

Format shift

In person is uniformly excellent; online is one excellent and one awful.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and participation dominate over pure sit-down exams.

Format shift

and video work; in and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In person students love her humor and care; and but seen as necessary for ASL.

Main concern

Lots of studying and participation are required to succeed.

What students said

“She is so sweet, caring, and funny! Class never felt like class!”
ASL1
“Lots of study words and homework, but needed to learn ASL.”
ASL1

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online splits between a miserable overload report and a .

Main concern

.

What students said

“She assigns more than 18+ assignments weekly.”
ASL1
“ and considerate to her students.”
ASL1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment leans on practice assignments and ; reviews do not clearly prove Lockdown Browser.

Video recordingsExam call onlineParticipationHeavy vocab practice

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person reviews emphasize studying and software policy.

Heavy studyingParticipation matters
“Lots of studying but its needed to learn ASL.”
ASL1
“Lots of study words and homework, but needed to learn ASL.”
ASL1

Online

and video recordings; one student noted patience during internet issues on the exam call.

Exam callVideo recordingsHeavy weekly assignments
“I was experiencing internet issues during the and !”
ASL1
“ .”
ASL1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Janet is a wonderful teacher and human! She is so VERY funny and I so enjoyed her class!”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting caring teaching versus heavy ASL practice load. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“She is so sweet, caring, and funny! Class never felt like class!”

📚 Workload Warning

22/100

“She assigns more than 18+ assignments weekly.”

❤️ Student Care

85/100

“ and considerate to her students.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

75/100

“I wish I could have taken ASL2 with her!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • sweet, caring, and funny
  • incredibly helpful and considerate
  • wonderful teacher and human

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lots of studying but its needed to learn ASL.
  • She assigns more than 18+ assignments weekly.
  • RUN

Theme 3

💻 About Online Format

  • internet issues during the and
  • This is the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Four recent 2020 reviews are detailed and consistent on care versus heavy practice, but sample size is still small.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ASL14 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values