AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Debra Whittaker

PHILO1 · PHIL7 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

great if you catch her teaching well, but verify office hours and current reliability first.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerAmazing lectures (one course)Clear grading criteriaPatient when presentOffice-hour no-show reportedPolarizing reliability
  • One student found her life-changing with and an easy-to-follow course
  • Another reported she skipped office hours and left students waiting for hours
  • ; sample is only two reviews

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

60/100

One A with and followable material; other review gives no grade and very hard difficulty.

All evidence is in person.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

PHIL7 felt clear and easy to follow, but PHILO1 was rated extremely hard with no teaching support.

All evidence is in person.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

; and you will not pass.

In-person only evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

One strong must-take endorsement versus a hard no over office-hour neglect.

In-person only; opinions fully split.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

and an A reported in PHIL7; .

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

; difficulty scores and availability issues dominate.

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Amazing lectures and patience in one course; complete unavailability in another.

Format shift

In-person only; quality 5 vs 1.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Comments emphasize lectures and homework.

Format shift

In-person only; sparse assessment detail.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

excellent patient PHIL lectures versus unavailable office hours in PHILO1.

Main concern

Possible absence from office hours and inconsistent availability.

What students said

“Shes patient and very understanding. and the course is easy to follow.”
PHIL7
“Debra Whittaker was not in office hours and not doing her work while we waited for hours.”
PHILO1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Clear grading criteriaAmazing lectures

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Clear material and ; .

Clear grading criteriaAmazing lectures
“ and the course is easy to follow.”
PHIL7

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great Professor, she made me consider changing majors. I .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews with conflicting quality. Credibility rating: Low.

🌟 Inspirational Teaching

90/100

“Great Professor, she made me consider changing majors. I .”

🚫 Availability Failure

10/100

“Debra Whittaker was not in office hours and not doing her work while we waited for hours.”

📚

75/100

“ and the course is easy to follow.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing lectures
  • Shes patient and very understanding
  • the course is easy to follow

Theme 2

⚠️ About Reliability

  • was not in office hours
  • not doing her work while we waited for hours

Theme 3

📈 About Fit

  • made me consider changing majors
  • I

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews years apart with opposite quality scores and sparse grade detail.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHIL71 review
PHILO11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values