AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Jenifer Kalamian

PHIL671100 · PHIL11 · PHIL7 · PHIL6 · PHIL14 · PHIL06 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
87/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
81.82%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you will show up, participate, and do the reading; she wants you to pass and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardInspirationalExtra CreditLecture HeavyClear ExpectationsParticipation Matters
  • Passionate, organized philosophy lectures that make abstract topics feel relevant and passable.
  • You must attend, read, and ; she rewards effort with study guides and .
  • A few students found her off-topic or abrupt in PHIL11, but most call her a .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Study guides, , and if you attend and do the work.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Philosophy reading and , but lectures demystify the material.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and missing class or test prep costs your grade.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

About four in ; enthusiasm is high outside a couple of PHIL11 complaints.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

, and study guides that nearly give the .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Weekly , and some group work keep the load steady.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students praise passion, clarity, and inspirational lectures; a few note rudeness or political digressions.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of , and occasional group presentations.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

- and reading-heavy but fair: attend, complete weekly write-ups, use her study guides, and grades stay strong.

Main concern

Skipping class or skipping the reading hurts; a minority felt she wandered into politics or seemed rude.

What students said

“Truly one of the !”
PHIL7
“she basically gives you the test. She makes her lectures very interesting”
PHIL7
“Good teacher, but she gets too distracted. She can go way off topic with political issues”
PHIL11

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are predictable if you attend prep and use her study guides; .

Study GuidesTest Prep SessionsEssay WritingQuizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and lecture examples; prep sessions are called critical.

Study GuidesTest Prep SessionsEssay Writing
“ ”
PHIL14
“Her study guides are straightforward, she basically gives you the test”
PHIL671100
“ ”
PHIL6

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Truly one of the ! I really wish I was able to take another one of her classes.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 in-person reviews, highlighting inspiration, workload, and a few personality critiques. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“Truly one of the !”

👍 Recommendation Rate

80/100

“ if I could.”

📚 Workload Reality

48/100

“ and analysis on that week's chapter from the textbook.”

⚖️ Fair Path to Pass

78/100

“She basically gives you the answers. Class is really easy (and ) *IF* you actually try”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • makes topics relevant to the students
  • Lectures are very interactive
  • Amazing lectures

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Very easy to pass if you just try
  • A lot of !
  • Do the homework (1-page responses) it helps your grade

Theme 3

⚠️ Mixed Notes

  • she gets too distracted. She can go way off topic with political issues
  • can be rude about things to her student

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven detailed reviews from 2017-2020 with mostly consistent praise and a .

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL75 reviews
PHIL112 reviews
PHIL061 review
PHIL141 review
PHIL61 review
Show 1 more courses
PHIL6711001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1