AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Lisa Raagas- Quarm

CDECE19 · LBS205 · CDECE47 · CDECE45 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you can handle strict deadlines, heavy writing, and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough GraderLots of HomeworkUnresponsive OnlineMandatory ParticipationMixed Reviews
  • Online sections draw heavy , and heavy weekly work.
  • some call her caring and .
  • Missing even one weekly task or forum can tank the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Tough grading, no curves, and perfect compliance.

Online reviews stress unforgiving weekly rules; a .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Heavy , and dense textbook work raise the intellectual and logistics load.

Online students describe tracking chaos; in-person notes long lectures and essay tests.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

; skip and you will not pass.

Both formats flag mandatory participation; online .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Only about 40 percent would retake her; online frustration outweighs scattered praise.

Online reviews are mostly Avoid; and avoid.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

28/100

Students report , and odd quiz formats that tank scores.

Format shift

Online toughness is louder; but .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of , and long tests keep the load high.

Format shift

Online load complaints dominate; in-person still notes long lectures and group projects.

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

Personally sweet for some, but , and textbook-reading lectures.

Format shift

Online experience is clearly worse; .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

38/100

Weekly forums, papers, quizzes, and .

Format shift

Online leans forums and dual-site quizzes; and long tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

some praise care and open-book , and tough grading.

Main concern

Long textbook lectures and she is personally nice.

What students said

“Easy A! I thought she was very easy, just show up and do the work.”
CDECE19
“Her lectures are nothing more than reading out of the textbook or ”
CDECE19
“Long lectures, death by PowerPoint. Lots of long tests, and essay questions.”
CDECE45

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report unresponsive and forums, and tough no-curve grading that can fail hard workers.

Main concern

, and failing for incomplete weekly posts even when major work is strong.

What students said

“She does not reply to your questions, comments or concerns. She is a ”
CDECE19
“I emailed 5 times and never got a reply”
LBS205
“still failed the course because I did not ”
CDECE19

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Some exams are open book/notes but timed online; and harsh.

Open Book Online TestsTimed QuizzesOdd Quiz FormatEssay Questions

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

long essay-style exams.

Open Book and NotesOnline Timed TestsLong Essay Tests
“ and note but are online which I hate because I see the timer and freak out”
CDECE19
“Lots of long tests, and essay questions”
CDECE45
“she lets you use ”
CDECE45

Online

Online quizzes and ; format complaints are common and unanswered.

Problematic Quiz FormatDual Websites for QuizzesTimed Assessments
“ and . She is aware yet does not change it.”
CDECE19
“she used 2 websites for and discussions”
LBS205

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and , and still failed the course because I did not complete every single weekly assignment.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews (6 online, 9 in-person), highlighting grading toughness and format split. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“Her lectures are nothing more than reading out of the textbook or .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

38/100

“If you , as it will bring down your GPA.”

⚖️

28/100

“I was marked down 2 points on a .”

📦 Workload Load

28/100

“A LOT OF WORK. Lack of compassion.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • death by PowerPoint
  • She is down to earth and easy to understand
  • copy-pasted from previous courses

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A! I thought she was very easy, just show up and do the work
  • still failed the course because I did not

Theme 3

📬 About Responsiveness

  • I emailed 5 times and never got a reply
  • Not quite responsive to emails(4-5 days)

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen reviews spanning 2008-2020 with and detailed grade outcomes.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 55
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CDECE199 reviews
CDECE452 reviews
CDECE472 reviews
LBS2052 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values