AI Rate Professor

Welding

Ray Montoya

WELD50 · WELD411 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want practical welding skill growth from an experienced, fun instructor.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHands-on booth coachIndustry experiencedHilarious mentorParticipation focusedStrong feedback
  • Highly skilled welding instructor who spends real time helping students in the booth
  • Grades lean toward technique practice and
  • Students earned A and A+ and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Students report A and A+ with and , though technique skill still matters.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

, but one section still rated difficulty at 4.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

68/100

, yet participation is graded so showing up still counts.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Both reviews are 5/5 and say overall great professor with real industry knowledge.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

and A-range outcomes with emphasis on booth .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

74/100

; main out-of-class pieces are Canvas quizzes.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

95/100

Students praise deep trade knowledge, booth help, humor, and willingness to spend extra time.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Assessment centers on booth technique and participation, with .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person welding labs feel engaging and supportive, with lots of booth coaching and .

Main concern

Participation .

What students said

“Helps out a lot in the booth, class is anything but boring.”
WELD50
“He focuses more on spending time developing technique in the booth then doing so but .”
WELD411

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention Canvas quizzes and but do .

Canvas quizzesParticipation gradingBooth technique focus

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person welding work is mainly booth practice plus Canvas quizzes; .

Canvas quizzesParticipation mattersBooth practice
“ . Overall great professor!”
WELD411

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Has a lot of knowledge and experience in the profession and is willing to spend extra time with students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person welding reviews, highlighting booth coaching and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

95/100

“Knows what hes taking about and gives a lot of insight.”

🔧 Hands-on Support

90/100

“Helps out a lot in the booth, class is anything but boring.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

96/100

“Overall great professor!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Helps out a lot in the booth
  • willing to spend extra time with students

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • focuses more on spending time developing technique in the booth then doing so
  • but you do get graded on participation

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Inspirational
  • Hilarious
  • Respected

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only two same-day 2019 reviews exist, both glowing and detailed, so confidence is limited by sample size.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

WELD4111 review
WELD501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values