AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Lenie Galima

STATS1 · STAT1 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.4/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

unless you already know statistics and can teach yourself with heavy math-center time.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDoes Not Know MaterialSelf Teach RequiredLots of HomeworkHigh Drop RateAvoid
  • Students say she makes frequent mistakes and does not understand statistics herself.
  • Heavy homework, weekly quizzes, and and self-study.
  • Zero would-take-again responses and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

, and weak instruction make an A unrealistic for most students.

; no online reviews were available.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Statistics content becomes much and students must self-teach.

; no online reviews were available.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

and link it to a good grade.

; no online reviews were available.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Every reported would-take-again answer is no, with .

; no online reviews were available.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

42/100

One student called her lenient with , but others report tough grading and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Lots of , and test-heavy pacing dominate reviews.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Students consistently say , and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Frequent quizzes, chapter tests, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person STAT1 sections are described as error-filled lectures with , and students correcting the professor.

Main concern

Instructor confusion on material .

What students said

“She does not know the material and she makes so many mistakes that the students are constantly correcting her.”
STATS1
“i basically had to and rely on the math center”
STAT1
“ and then say never mind it wont be on the test”
STAT1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe frequent quizzes and regular tests but .

Weekly QuizzesTest HeavyPop QuizzesIn-Person Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person STAT courses use frequent quizzes and .

Weekly QuizzesTest HeavyPop QuizzesIn-Person Exams
“ . 1 test per every 2 chapters.”
STAT1
“ ”
STATS1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She does not know the material and she makes so many mistakes that the students are constantly correcting her. The only way to pass is to either know the material beforehand or get extra tutoring.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 in-person reviews, highlighting instruction quality, workload, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

💥 Teaching Quality

15/100

“ . Makes so many mistakes and confuses the entire class.”

📚 Workload

18/100

“lots of homework... . 1 test per every 2 chapters.”

🚫 Recommendation

5/100

“ !”

🧠

12/100

“if youre bad at math like me, dont take this, its more of a self taught type”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She does not understand the material herself.
  • students are constantly correcting her
  • You wont learn anything from her

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Half of the class dropped throughout the semester

Theme 3

⚠️ About Support

  • gets frustrated when you ask questions
  • make sure you have the availability to spend a lot of time in the math center
  • She offers a lot of !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are highly consistent on poor teaching and high workload.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

STAT15 reviews
STATS12 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 2