AI Rate Professor

Journalism

Cindy Fyre

JOURN45 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless you have no other option; the only review reports a , and unfriendly journalism experience.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderUnclear gradingRude and criticalMandatory attendanceOutdated textbook
  • Student describes her as rude, critical, and unprepared.
  • and tough, with few graded items.
  • and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

and even with attendance and effort.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Difficulty was moderate, but poor preparation and content alone.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

and the if you miss.

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

and describes a , and harsh class.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Tagged as a and few graded items.

Format shift

Based on one in-person review.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Lectures are long and assignments are poorly prepared, but volume is not described as crushing.

Format shift

Based on one in-person review.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Student , and overly critical.

Format shift

Based on one in-person review.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

Tagged as graded by few things, so outcomes hinge on a small set of assessments.

Format shift

Based on one in-person review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person JOURN45 felt rude, poorly prepared, and harshly graded, with and outdated materials.

Main concern

, and an unfriendly classroom tone.

What students said

“Rude and . Not always prepared to give assignments.”
JOURN45

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not detail proctoring, but as tough, sparse, and unclear.

Tough GradingFew Graded ItemsUnclear Criteria

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or open-book rules, only tough and unclear grading.

Tough GradingFew Graded ItemsUnclear Criteria
“Rude and .”
JOURN45

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Rude and . Not always prepared to give assignments. Lectures are long without reason or explanation.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review, highlighting harsh tone and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

24/100

“Rude and . Not always prepared to give assignments.”

⚖️

18/100

“ .”

👎 Recommendation

8/100

“Not friendly and very critical almost like treating you like a child.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are long without reason or explanation.
  • Not .
  • Not friendly and very critical almost like treating you like a child.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Rude and .
  • Skip class? You won't pass.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

, so findings are directionally clear but not broadly confirmed.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

JOURN451 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values