AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Robert Lobliner

MATH815 · CHEM2A · CHEM1 · CHEM2 · CHEMCHEM · HSC1 · CHEM1A · CHEM3204 · MATH120 · CHEM3048 · CHEMISTRY · CHM1A · CHEM7062 · CHEM2AND1A · 38 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
42.86%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

Avoid unless you are strong in , and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerConfusing lecturesCryptic gradingTough examsOpen notes quizzesTest heavy
  • Many students say lectures and knowledge.
  • Classes are test- and ; open notes help only if notes are excellent.
  • Recommendation rate is low; several warn of and poor teaching clarity.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Open notes and exist, but and strict marking make an A rare without exceptional effort.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Material and pace feel hard, with quizzes and labs described as brutal for average students.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

and others optional; no single consistent rule.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

and frequent warnings outweigh older praise for mentorship or open notes.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

28/100

Students describe cryptic marks, perfection expectations, and little partial-credit clarity.

Format shift

In-person only; no online comparison.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Frequent quizzes, weekly homework, labs, and .

Format shift

In-person only; no online comparison.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Many call him knowledgeable but , and weak at explaining formulas and labs.

Format shift

In-person only; no online comparison.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Quizzes, multiple exams, and labs dominate; some open-notes quizzes reduce but .

Format shift

In-person only; no online comparison.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

38 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person chem and and high-pressure, with and tough quizzes despite some open-notes flexibility.

Main concern

, and grading marks students cannot interpret.

What students said

“ and much of it isn't in the book or part of the lecture.”
CHEM2
“ advantage”
CHEM1A
“ , slashes, numbers, and Ws. It is very difficult to understand what you get wrong and why.”
CHEM1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Open-notes quizzes help, but tests and .

Open notes quizzesTough testsCryptic grading marksWeekly quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and exams are often open notes yet still tough, with .

Open notesWeekly quizzesHarder than homeworkCryptic marks
“ advantage”
CHEM1A
“his quizes are brutal as he likes to customize terminology to confuse you”
CHEM2

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and much of it isn't in the book or part of the lecture.”

Voice snapshots generated from 38 reviews, highlighting confusion, grading opacity, and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

34/100

“He knows his material but severely lacks teaching skills!”

📝

28/100

“ , slashes, numbers, and Ws.”

🧪

32/100

“his quizes are brutal as he likes to customize terminology to confuse you”

👎 Recommendation

38/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures put you to sleep
  • tends to go off topic during lecture
  • Smart guy who lacks teaching skills

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Probably 90% of the class dropped
  • Even if you show all the work ... you will get marked off
  • and lots of opportunities

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

  • when you ask him questions he will belittle you
  • Not willing to help students in lab
  • Find a professor who has patients

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

38

Recent reviews read by the AI

38

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-eight reviews across many years consistently flag confusing teaching and .

Inside 38 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 53
3 out of 56
2 out of 511
1 out of 510

Course coverage

CHEM212 reviews
CHEM1A11 reviews
MATH1203 reviews
CHM1A2 reviews
CHEM11 review
Show 9 more courses
CHEM2A1 review
CHEM2AND1A1 review
CHEM30481 review
CHEM32041 review
CHEM70621 review
CHEMCHEM1 review
CHEMISTRY1 review
HSC11 review
MATH8151 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather_Not_Say 1