AI Rate Professor

Foods & Nutrition

Elvia Mieras

FN224 · FN20 · FOODANDNU · NUTRITION · FOODNUTR · FN7207 · FOODFN20 · F20 · FN5088 · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if and study guides; less ideal if you need heavy instructor support online.

Best fit · Self Taught ProExtra credit availableStudy-guide dependentMixed online experienceTextbook heavyNotes allowed on some exams
  • In-person students often praise her as , and achievable As
  • Older and online-leaning comments frequently , and weak communication
  • Success depends on following the syllabus, study guides, and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Many report easy As with study guides and , but and require detailed reading.

Recent online review is positive; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Intro nutrition content is straightforward for some, but and .

Online and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

, while many online-style comments do not emphasize attendance.

In-person mentions roll-taking; online .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Strong fans exist, but a sizable group warns against her for communication and workload issues.

Recent online is positive; older in-person comments are polarized.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

, makeups, and notes on some exams help, but if you miss the study guide focus.

Format shift

Both formats mention ; .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Some call it light with study guides; , and time-consuming online tasks.

Format shift

Workload complaints appear more in older online-leaning comments tagged as in-person in data.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Praise for niceness and structure is offset by criticism of and outdated content.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

Multiple quizzes and plus discussions online.

Format shift

Online 8-week format had 2 tests; in-person often cites 5 tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

many call her easy and and , while others cite outdated material, heavy reading, or confusing online-style communication.

Main concern

Inconsistent clarity and workload complaints, especially for reading-heavy sections.

What students said

“She's the ! You have one research project, gives away a lot of , 5 tests are (easy)”
FN20
“WAY TOO MUCH WORK for an intro general ed online course.”
FN20
“ unless you are self taught.”
FN20

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Recent online FN20 student liked frequent , and only two tests in an 8-week term.

Main concern

Single recent online review; older online-leaning comments in the set are more mixed.

What students said

“ the next assignment and also has study guides.”
FN20

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often multiple choice and study-guide based; some allow notes, and .

Multiple choiceStudy guidesNotes allowed on some examsTimed online tests

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person and older online-leaning comments describe multiple-choice tests from slides or the book, sometimes with notes allowed.

Multiple choiceStudy guide mirrored testsNotes on some examsTimed online-style tests
“ . You have to read but and practice exams!”
FN20
“ --given 90 minutes for each.”
FN20

Online

One online review notes only two tests in an 8-week class with study guides and short assignments.

Two testsStudy guidesShort discussions
“She only had 2 tests throughout the semester but it was an 8week online class.”
FN20

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's the reason why I chose Nutrition as my major! She's the !”

Voice snapshots generated from 24 reviews (1 online, 23 in-person), highlighting polarized ease, study-guide strategy, and online friction. Credibility rating: Medium.

📚 Study Guide Path

62/100

“Buy the outline, follow it in class, do the reading and extra workbook and you'll get an A.”

⚠️

40/100

“ unless you are self taught.”

👍

70/100

“ the next assignment and also has study guides.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's great! On the !
  • She's chill and not a horrible teacher.
  • not a clear teacher.Worse than any online class I have ever had.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you do that, easy A!
  • WAY TOO MUCH WORK for an intro general ed online course.
  • . You need to study for it, but it's not too bad

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • and is approachable.
  • Doesn't seem to get the concept that ON-line means MORE explaining to do.
  • I took her online class and she made you work so hard

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

24

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-four reviews provide volume, but many are old (2004-2014), polarized, and light on grade detail, lowering consistency.

Inside 24 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 52
3 out of 54
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

FN2016 reviews
F201 review
FN2241 review
FN50881 review
FN72071 review
Show 4 more courses
FOODANDNU1 review
FOODFN201 review
FOODNUTR1 review
NUTRITION1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values