AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Clarisa Williams

MATH120 · GEOMETRY40 · MATH47 · MATH45 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
26/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Avoid if ; only consider if and want a flexible, low-structure class.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor explanationsSelf-teach requiredSweet but ineffectiveUnprepared lecturesAvoid for math
  • Students say but weak at explaining math and frustrated by questions.
  • You are expected to already know material and often must teach yourself.
  • One easier section with exists, but most urge avoidance.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Some earn As with self-study and , but weak instruction makes the grade depend on teaching yourself.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Material is not inherently advanced, but poor explanations raise the effective challenge for most students.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

; skip-class tags appear, but details on flexibility are limited.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Four of five reviews would not take her again and .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

She can work with missed work and offers in some sections, but .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

; graded by few things, but self-teaching adds hidden work.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

Students describe confusion at the , and unprepared, outdated delivery.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

65/100

Few graded items and matter; lectures do not carry learning, so self-prep for assessments is key.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

lectures, refusal to re-explain, and outdated overhead-style teaching.

Main concern

and can stress students into dropping.

What students said

“She's sweet & wants all her students to pass. But she's honestly so bad at teaching.”
MATH45
“Professor Williams is just plain lazy and not prepared. teach and explain.”
MATH120
“Sweet lady but teaching skills are lackluster.”
GEOMETRY40

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; assessment is sparse and uneven across sections.

Few graded itemsExtra credit in some sections

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments focus on few graded items and rather than specific exam security or format.

Few graded itemsExtra credit
“lots of xc. boring but easy.”
MATH47
“book wasn't necessary since she'd put the .”
MATH45

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's sweet & wants all her students to pass. But she's honestly so bad at teaching. She refuses to go over problems when asked for help because "we already did that". Be prepared to teach yourself.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews, highlighting weak instruction despite personal kindness. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“Professor Williams is just plain lazy and not prepared. teach and explain.”

🚫 Recommendation

18/100

“ so far. AVOID IF POSSIBLE!!!”

📚

40/100

“by her lectures, she expects you to already know most of the material”

🍬 Kindness vs Skill

30/100

“ if you have zero patience. Her lack of teaching rapor and competence will stress you out”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • honestly so bad at teaching
  • teaching skills are lackluster
  • boring but easy

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Only 5 reviews, but they are recent enough and highly consistent on weak teaching despite kindness.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH452 reviews
GEOMETRY401 review
MATH1201 review
MATH471 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1