AI Rate Professor

English

Wooi Ong

ENG3 · ENG105 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Prefer his in-person ENG3 if you like critical writing with outlines; .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerCritical thinking focusTough GraderGives good feedbackOutline-driven essaysFormat-dependent experience
  • In-person ENG3 often praised for critical thinking, outlines, and inspiration
  • Online ENG3 and ENG105 drew strong avoid-style complaints
  • , but effort plus templates can still earn solid grades

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Several students earn A/B grades with outlines, but and critical standards mean an A still takes real writing effort.

Online felt rigid and draining; in-person ENG3 rewards structured critical writing.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content can feel easy to understand, but articulating meaningful ideas and meeting his standards is the hard part.

; online felt harder and more tedious.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

75/100

; others do not stress roll call.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Multiple in-person students would take again for critical thinking growth, but online and ENG105 voices strongly disagree.

In-person ENG3 is mostly recommended; online ENG3 is not.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Repeated Tough Grader tags and use his outline.

Format shift

Both formats report strict expectations about doing work his way.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Essays and reading are central; online student found the outlines.

Format shift

Online workload felt heavier and more boring than in-person ENG3.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

In-person students call him inspirational and hilarious; online and ENG105 reviews call him boring or abrasive.

Format shift

In-person ENG3 scores high; online and ENG105 drag the average down.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

, and assignment guidelines rather than classic timed exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize papers and assignment instructions.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person ENG3 students often praise critical thinking and , while one ENG105 review criticizes unclear guidelines and abrasive responses.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“The prof's goal is to get you to think critically and be able to articulate it.”
ENG3
“The outline he wants you to use.”
ENG3
“His abrasive responses make it difficult to be active in the course. ”
ENG105

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One online ENG3 review calls the work extremely boring and strict about doing things only his way.

Main concern

and rigid instructions.

What students said

“Horrible, the , and I like doing long work but this is way bad. ”
ENG3

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; reviews do not clearly prove proctored exams.

Essay-focusedOutline templatesStrict instruction following

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and outline based; reviews do not clearly describe closed-book or proctored exams.

Essay outlines providedCritical thinking papersFeedback-heavy grading
“The outline he wants you to use.”
ENG3
“If you can prove that and follow a template that's pretty straight forward, you will do well.”
ENG3

Online

Online ENG3 emphasizes long boring assignments with clear but rigid instructions; .

Long online assignmentsStrict do-it-his-way instructionsClear written instructions
“Instructions for about doing things only his way.”
ENG3

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This class is not like a normal course. The prof's goal is to get you to think critically and be able to articulate it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews (1 online, 4 in person), highlighting format-dependent teaching and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Critical Thinking Focus

78/100

“The prof's goal is to get you to think critically and be able to articulate it.”

💻 Online Warning

25/100

“ professors out there who will not drain the life out of you through a computer.”

⚖️ Tough but Structured

55/100

“The outline he wants you to use.”

⚠️

30/100

“he misuses his time with just those things. He then makes assignments hastily and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he makes you think
  • Outlines are given to help you structure your words.
  • enough personality and vivacity to capture the classes attention with humour

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • follow a template that's pretty straight forward, you will do well
  • The outline

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • Horrible, the
  • he's very strict about doing things only his way
  • Glad it's over.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews spanning 2013-2017 with mixed formats, concrete quotes, and .

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG34 reviews
ENG1051 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values