AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Holly Mikhael

PHIL · PHIL7 · PHIL101 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Good choice for intro philosophy if you will keep up with readings and quizzes; she helps you understand.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyPatient explainerReading quizzesPassionate about philosophyParticipation mattersGroup projects
  • Students call her nice, passionate, and willing to rephrase until philosophy clicks.
  • Expect , and a term paper.
  • Overall easy to pass if you read and study, with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Students say she is easy to pass and tests are easy if you study, with one reported A, though readings and .

; one review is pre-enrollment and not real experience.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Philosophy readings can be hard, but she translates fallacies into modern English and keeps the course passable.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

and tags say participation matters; others do not detail policy.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

Would take again is 100% among those who stated it, and students call her nice and .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Described as easy to pass with tests that are manageable when you study; .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Reading for every class quiz , and possible group projects.

Format shift

All workload comments are from in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

, and re-explains concepts in clearer language.

Format shift

All teaching comments are from in-person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of , and group projects.

Format shift

All assessment comments are from in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person philosophy is described as , and manageable tests if you study.

Main concern

Dense readings and .

What students said

“Nice professor and .”
PHIL101
“quiz every class on the . , and a term paper. tests were easy if you study.”
PHIL7
“She is easy and you can surely pass it.”
PHIL

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and final that are easy if you study; .

Quiz every classMidterm and finalTerm paperStudy-based tests

Assessment risk

Standard

65/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

quiz every class on the , and term paper; tests easy if you study.

Daily reading quizzesMidtermFinalTerm paper
“quiz every class on the . , and a term paper. tests were easy if you study.”
PHIL7

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Nice professor and . You need to read but she helps everyone get a good grasp on the subject”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person philosophy reviews, noting one pre-enrollment comment. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“if you are having and she will try to explain in a way that you can better understand.”

📖 Reading Load

55/100

“quiz every class on the ”

🅰️ Passability

78/100

“She is easy and you can surely pass it.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and is passionate about philosophy

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if you study
  • She is easy and you can surely pass it
  • You need to read

Theme 3

📝 About Assessments

  • , and a term paper
  • GROUP PROJECTS

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

, but one is pre-class hype and samples are few across 2014-2017.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL1012 reviews
PHIL1 review
PHIL71 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Pass 1