AI Rate Professor

Human Services

Cameyca Austin

COSA14 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Worth considering for COSA14 if , but expect sparse public detail and do your own syllabus check.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGet ready to readHigh quality ratingsWould take againLimited review sample
  • Only two reviews exist, both perfect quality scores and .
  • In-person students warn to get ready to read; online student simply called the class awesome and earned an A.
  • Sample is too thin for .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Grades reported are A and B+ with one low-difficulty online review, but .

Online review shows easier A path; and a B+.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

Average difficulty is moderate-low, though the in-person tag warns students to get ready to read.

Online student rated difficulty 1; in-person student rated difficulty 3 with .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

as mandatory.

and in-person COSA14.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

85/100

and gave perfect quality scores, despite almost no narrative depth.

Recommendation is unanimous but based on only two short reviews across formats.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

70/100

Reported grades are A and B+ with .

Format shift

Online student earned A; in-person student earned B+.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The only concrete workload cue is Get ready to read; .

Format shift

; online review gives no workload detail.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

Both students gave 5/5 quality and , but comments are too short to prove teaching depth.

Format shift

High marks appear in both online and .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One in-person COSA14 student rated her 5/5, flagged Get , and earned a B+.

Main concern

detail on teaching style or exams.

What students said

“Get Ready To Read”
COSA14

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

One online COSA14 student rated her 5/5, found difficulty low, earned an A, and simply called the class awesome.

Main concern

Only one short online review with .

What students said

“Awesome!!”
COSA14

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, open-book status, or proctoring for either format.

Reading heavyNo clear exam policy stated

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and does not describe exam logistics.

Get ready to read
“Get Ready To Read”
COSA14

Online

Online .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Get Ready To Read”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews (1 online, 1 in-person), with very limited quote depth. Credibility rating: Low.

👍 Perfect Scores

85/100

“Awesome!!”

📖 Reading Load

55/100

“Get Ready To Read”

🎯

85/100

“Awesome!!”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • Get Ready To Read

Theme 2

❤️ About Overall Experience

  • Awesome!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two sparse reviews across two formats leave very limited detail for confident conclusions.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

COSA142 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values