AI Rate Professor

Criminal Justice

Scott Robertson

ADJUS269 · AJ16 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid ADJUS269 if you want a ; AJ16 may work if you like straight police-experience lectures and can handle a tough tone.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerLecture heavySarcastic classroom toneAcademy-style pressurePolarizing CJ instructorClear grading criteria
  • ADJUS269 reviews warn of sarcasm, long boring lectures, and a police-academy vibe that shuts down student opinions.
  • AJ16 reviews are more positive, citing LBPD experience, straightforward lectures, and interesting discussions.
  • ; outcome depends heavily on which course and tolerance for a hard-edged style.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Negative reviews say you must try hard not to fail or fall asleep, skip class and you will not pass, and no easy-grade language appears.

; no online reviews exist.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Lecture-heavy content, long notes, and academy-style expectations make the course feel demanding and draining for many.

; no online reviews exist.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Tags and comments warn that skipping class means you will not pass, and as mandatory.

; no online reviews exist.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

33/100

Would-take-again is only about one-third and multiple students .

; AJ16 is more positive than ADJUS269.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Students note , but the overall tone is strict and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Lecture-heavy notes and warnings that skipping class sinks you point to a dense, high-attention workload.

Format shift

All workload comments come from in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Some respect his LBPD experience, but multiple students call him sarcastic, unhelpful, and unsafe for questions or opinions.

Format shift

All teaching comments come from in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Reviews emphasize lecture-heavy content and note-taking more than projects, with pass risk tied to attending lectures.

Format shift

All assessment comments come from in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

ADJUS269 students call him sarcastic and unsafe for opinions, while AJ16 students like LBPD stories and .

Main concern

Sarcastic tone, lecture-heavy format, and academy-style pressure that some students find demeaning.

What students said

“You can't even feel safe with mentioning your own opinion without criticism and sarcasm.”
ADJUS269
“he is very sarcastic you can't ask him anything without him making you feel stupid.”
ADJUS269
“Talks about his experience working for the LBPD. Straightforward lectures as well as interesting class discussions.”
AJ16

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; risk comes from dense lectures and strict classroom tone.

Lecture heavyLong notesAttendance criticalClear grading criteria

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence stresses long lecture notes and .

Lecture heavyLong notesSkip class and you won't pass
“Long notes. Boring class. You need to try really hard to not fall asleep”
ADJUS269
“ .”
ADJUS269

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Don't even bother with taking this class. You can't even feel safe with mentioning your own opinion without criticism and sarcasm.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews, contrasting ADJUS269 hostility with milder AJ16 praise. Credibility rating: Medium.

😤 Classroom Climate

25/100

“You can't even feel safe with mentioning your own opinion without criticism and sarcasm.”

📉 Recommendation Risk

33/100

“ . Tip: take another professor !”

👮 Real-World Content

70/100

“Talks about his experience working for the LBPD. Straightforward lectures as well as interesting class discussions.”

📚 Lecture Load

30/100

“Long notes. Boring class. You need to try really hard to not fall asleep”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Acts like his class is the academy. so ever
  • He needs to work on his people skills and not treat the class like a police academy
  • Straightforward lectures as well as interesting class discussions

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Skip class? You won't pass
  • Long notes. Boring class

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Safety

  • you can't ask him anything without him making you feel stupid
  • You can't even feel safe with mentioning your own opinion without criticism and sarcasm

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

and consistent sarcasm complaints, but the sample remains small.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ADJUS2692 reviews
AJ162 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values