AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Allen Newton

POLSCI1 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Looks like a fun, solid POLSCI pick based on one strong review, but treat that as a thin signal.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyHilariousGood FeedbackGroup ProjectsStudent FriendlyLow Sample
  • Single review is fully positive with an A grade and .
  • Tagged for , and .
  • Sample size is too small to trust beyond a promising first impression.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

The only student reported an A with moderate difficulty and no struggle narrative.

All .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

75/100

Difficulty rated 2 of 5 with a short positive comment, suggesting approachable content.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

The as mandatory.

All .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

The and rates quality a perfect 5.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

75/100

A grade plus positive tags and .

Format shift

All .

Workload

Light

70/100

Difficulty is low and the brief comment implies a manageable experience; group projects are noted.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Perfect quality rating with hilarious and and a would-take-again yes.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Group projects are tagged; exams are not described, so balance is assumed rather than proven.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

One in-person POLSCI1 student called him great, gave a 5 quality rating, earned an A, and .

Main concern

Only one review exists, so results could change with more data.

What students said

“he was great”
POLSCI1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; only group projects are explicitly tagged.

Group Projects

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The only in-person review does not describe exams; .

Group Projects
“he was great”
POLSCI1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“he was great”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review with limited detail. Credibility rating: Low.

⭐ Perfect Quality Score

90/100

“he was great”

😂 Hilarious Classroom Energy

88/100

“he was great”

👍

90/100

“he was great”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he was great
  • Hilarious

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • he was great

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one short 2016 review exists, so scores and tags rest on a .

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

POLSCI11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values