AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Stacey Smith

CDSED67 · CDECE19 · CDEC1 · CDECE1 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you want hands-on child development learning and will show up and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHands-On LearningGuest SpeakersStrict AttendanceAssignment HeavyWarm Supportive
  • Hands-on Child Development teaching with guest families and interactive projects
  • Attendance is strict and
  • Mostly beloved and fair, but one older review called her rude and unclear

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

No tests but hard work on every assignment plus strict attendance means an A still takes steady effort.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Material is engaging and well explained, with difficulty mainly from participation and project expectations.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and even awards points each class, so skipping is costly.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

and real-world learning despite one negative personality critique.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

72/100

Students say she expects work but grades fairly, with projects and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Lots of papers and projects replace tests, so workload is steady rather than light.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

and real childcare expertise for most students.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews emphasize papers, projects, and participation with little or no testing.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person Child Development classes are interactive and supportive, with guest speakers and .

Main concern

and unclear assignments can frustrate students who want lighter structure.

What students said

“She has real family experiences come to class and talk to us about their child with the disability we are learning about.”
CDSED67
“Very strict on Attendance 5 points per class for showing up.”
CDECE19
“Instead of loads of . I loved her!”
CDECE1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is assignment and .

No TestsPapers and ProjectsParticipation

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

85/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and participation instead of loads of tests.

No TestsLots of PapersProjectsAttendance Points
“You have to because there are no tests.”
CDECE19
“Instead of loads of .”
CDECE1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's the director at the PCC Child Development Center, and she's also (yay!) a wonderful teacher; and full of information.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person reviews, , and one negative clarity critique. Credibility rating: Medium.

🌟 Hands-On Teaching

84/100

“learning in class is hands-on & interactive (rather than lecture-based.)”

📅

18/100

“Very strict on Attendance 5 points per class for showing up.”

📝

72/100

“She expects you to work, but is very fair with .”

👍

82/100

“ if you are willing to learn.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She has a different teaching style in a positive way
  • and is very good with her students
  • and full of information

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You have to because there are no tests
  • She expects you to work, but is very fair with
  • as well as class participation

Theme 3

⚠️ Mixed Personality Notes

  • She's quite full of herself and I honestly didn't learn much
  • , and her clarity of them is really poor
  • Talks to much and she's not that intresting

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Six mostly positive in-person reviews span 2009-2016 with solid detail, but the sample is small and older.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CDECE12 reviews
CDSED672 reviews
CDEC11 review
CDECE191 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values