AI Rate Professor

Culinary Arts

Pierre Jues

CULAR243 · CULAR200 · CHOCOLATE · CULAR204205 · CULAR200A · CULBAK · CULAR241 · CULAR207 · PAST101 · INTROBAKING · CULAR220 · CULAR204 · NTROTOCHOC · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you care about baking, show up prepared, and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful ChefHands-On BakingPatient but FirmFrench AccentConstructive Feedback
  • Strong , and rich in pastry knowledge
  • Hands-on classes reward effort; waste and mistakes can draw sharp public criticism
  • Most students praise him highly; a minority found demos boring or him unfair when upset

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Participation and effort matter more than harsh testing; several students say good grades come if you engage and ask for help.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

and hands-on, though kitchen standards and attention to detail still matter.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Several reviews mark attendance mandatory for lab-style culinary classes, so showing up is expected.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

84/100

Most students call him the and want more classes, tempered by a few mean or boring experiences.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

75/100

Helpful and often lenient if you try hard, though he can be harsh about waste and quality standards.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

72/100

Lab baking is the main work; kickback participation classes and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Knowledgeable, funny, and accent comprehension issues.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Practical kitchen performance and participation drive grades more than formal written exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person culinary and baking labs are hands-on, practical, and harsh moments over waste or mistakes.

Main concern

Can embarrass students for mistakes or waste ingredients, and some demo-heavy classes feel passive.

What students said

“Chef Pierre is the . He gives constructive feedback, is SO helpful”
CULAR243
“Try not to make any mistakes or wasting his ingredients he gets really mad and embarrasses you really bad”
241
“ . He's full of baking knowledge & always there to answer your questions.”
CULAR204

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Success is based on hands-on baking, participation, and asking for help rather than strict written exams.

Hands-On LabsParticipation GradePractical Baking

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and effort; reviews do not describe proctored written exams.

Hands-On BakingParticipationPractical Skills
“The class is very kickback you just bake all the time and as long as you participate you'll get a good grade.”
INTROBAKING
“His baking classes are very hands on, and if he knows that you are putting in effort to the class.”
CULAR204

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Chef Pierre is the . He gives constructive feedback, is SO helpful, and I am happy to have had the privilege of taking this class with him.”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 in-person reviews, balancing strong baking mentorship praise with firm kitchen critiques. Credibility rating: High.

👨‍🍳 Teaching Strength

82/100

“ . Stayed after class to teach me how to do simple tasks I'd never learned.”

👍 Recommendation

84/100

“Chef Pierre is the classes I took with him!”

⚠️ Kitchen Intensity

55/100

“he gets really mad and embarrasses you really bad it was done to me and I seen him do it to others.”

🥖 Easy if You Participate

78/100

“as long as you participate you'll get a good grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • SO helpful
  • He's full of baking knowledge & always there to answer your questions

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • as long as you participate you'll get a good grade
  • It's a challenging but fun class

Theme 3

⚠️ About Tough Moments

  • he gets really mad and embarrasses you really bad
  • I found him to be unfair, rude, and insulting
  • all you do is sit there and watch him make everything, nothing is hands on

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Nineteen in-person reviews from 2005-2016 provide a large, consistent picture with both praise and specific criticisms.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CULAR2044 reviews
CULAR2002 reviews
CULAR200A2 reviews
2411 review
CHOCOLATE1 review
Show 9 more courses
CULAR2042051 review
CULAR2071 review
CULAR2201 review
CULAR2411 review
CULAR2431 review
CULBAK1 review
INTROBAKING1 review
NTROTOCHOC1 review
PAST1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1