AI Rate Professor

English

Sarah Roussin

ENGL801 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

Avoid unless you can teach yourself the material without instructor support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnhelpfulDisorganizedAssumes Prior KnowledgeUninterestedWeak Final
  • Students felt she was unhelpful and assumed prior knowledge.
  • Teaching came across as uninterested or inexperienced.
  • as a joke, with little guidance.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

50/100

Course difficulty was rated very low, but described.

Single in-person review; no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

80/100

Difficulty rating is 1 and content does not sound intellectually hard; the issue is teaching support.

Single in-person review; no online evidence.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

review.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

The only review is strongly negative on help, interest, and teaching competence.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

; but grade outcomes are not reported.

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Light

65/100

Low difficulty rating and ; main issue is instruction quality.

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Described as unhelpful, uninterested, and possibly first-year with little command of teaching.

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

65/100

The no strong homework narrative.

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One in-person review describes unhelpful teaching, assumed knowledge, and a .

Main concern

Little support if you do not already understand the material.

What students said

“ .”
ENGL801

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The as a joke, but proctoring and format details are not clearly stated.

Weak Final

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Student called the rules.

Weak Final
“ !”
ENGL801

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . She assumed that you knew what she was talking about and if you didn't know she expected you to just figure it out.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review from 2015. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“I'm sure it was her first year teaching because she didn't seem interested in teaching.”

👎 Recommendation

15/100

“So good luck!”

📝

45/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • She assumed that you knew what she was talking about.
  • she didn't seem interested in teaching or she just simply didn't know what she was doing.

Theme 2

📈 About Assessments

  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Only one older review with limited grade and policy detail; credibility is low despite a .

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGL8011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values