AI Rate Professor

Instructional Technology

Jason Stevens

CAOTC47 · COSA50 · COSA30 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
87/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.7

The decision

if you want a and plan to attend regularly so you do not fall behind.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyPatient instructorHelps after classStraightforwardAttendance suggestedMoves fast if you miss
  • Students describe Stevens as , and willing to help during and after class.
  • but missing days leaves you behind because the class moves quickly.
  • Sample is small, yet all three reviews stay positive on support and learning.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

Difficulty ratings are low and students report straightforward work with .

All ; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

Material is described as straightforward and he slows down for students, though the .

All ; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

72/100

, but missing class makes it hard to keep up with quick assignment progress.

All ; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

84/100

and after-class help if you are willing to learn and show up.

All ; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

; reviews emphasize clear expectations and support to succeed.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

74/100

Students mention daily text use and assignment progress, but not an .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

86/100

Consistently praised for patience, clarity, slowing down, and helping students after class.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Comments focus on moving through assignments and class work rather than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person instructional technology classes are called straightforward and but .

Main concern

Missing a few days can feel like entering a different class because .

What students said

“Great instructor. Always willing to slow things down, takes the time to help students during/after class.”
COSA50
“ ,if .”
CAOTC47
“everything is straight forward no suprises really learned alot in his class”
COSA30

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; assessment appears assignment-centered.

Assignment-driven progress

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

proctoring policy and emphasize assignment progress instead.

Assignment-driven progress
“I missed a few days and I felt like I was in a completely different .)”
COSA50

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He's an excellent professor. ,if . He is willing to help the students after class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 , and straightforward work. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

86/100

“Always willing to slow things down, takes the time to help students during/after class.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

84/100

“ if you are willing to learn.”

📅

72/100

“ , but highly suggested.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • everything is straight forward no suprises really learned alot in his class
  • ,if .
  • Great instructor. Always willing to slow things down

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Difficulty ratings stay low across reviews
  • .
  • no suprises really learned alot

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

and ease, but they lack grade data and .

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CAOTC471 review
COSA301 review
COSA501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values