AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Kele Perkins

PHILOSOPHY11 · PHIL11 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid unless you have no other option; expect , and weak support.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerBrutal TestsUnpreparedEmail GhostHomework OverloadTangents
  • and cumulative format
  • and
  • Lectures often off-topic;

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even capable students report B or A- and .

; no online reviews available.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

Difficulty ratings are maxed out and students describe confusing, off-topic lectures paired with huge assessments.

; no online reviews available.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and reading as critical; missing class is risky.

; no online reviews available.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students warn others away due to unprepared teaching, ignored emails, and crushing tests.

; no online reviews available.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Tests are called hard but sometimes fair; .

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

Homework can hit around 200 questions per set plus many papers and huge cumulative exams.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

Often described as unprepared, off-topic, and unresponsive, with one milder note that tests can be fair if you prepare.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Tags and and multi-part exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Difficult philosophy courses with , and frequent complaints about unprepared lectures and ignored emails.

Main concern

Test volume and unreliable study-guide communication.

What students said

“assigns around 200 questions per , and spends most of class going off on tangents instead of actually teaching.”
71754
“ .”
PHILOSOPHY11
“ . Test one, then test 1 and 2, then test 3 and 2 the whole tests for over 200 questions total.”
71754

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are large, cumulative, and described as brutal, with weekly quizzes when prepared.

200+ question testsCumulative examsWeekly quizzesTest heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person tests run about 200 questions, often cumulative, with weekly quizzes when the professor is prepared.

200-question testsCumulative examsWeekly quizzes
“His test are about 200 questions each and there were supposed to be 3 but since he forgot to email us a guide he made a new one to make up for it.”
PHILOSOPHY11
“ . Test one, then test 1 and 2, then test 3 and 2 the whole tests for over 200 questions total.”
71754
“ but fair. Some material straight from the textbook, some from lectures.”
PHIL11

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews with , and unpreparedness. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“This professor is horribly unprepared, left keys one time at home so class got delayed.”

📚 Workload Overload

12/100

“assigns around 200 questions per ”

📝

22/100

“ . Test one, then test 1 and 2, then test 3 and 2 the whole tests for over 200 questions total.”

👎 Recommendation

18/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Always off topic and sometimes says it is not and it is
  • spends most of class going off on tangents instead of actually teaching
  • Does not like the book. Teaches what he likes.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • but fair.
  • .
  • Attendence and .

Theme 3

📧 About Communication

  • He also is horrible at emailing students, especially when it comes to study guides.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only 4 reviews with mixed ages, but and poor communication are strongly consistent.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

717542 reviews
PHIL111 review
PHILOSOPHY111 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values