AI Rate Professor

Physical Ed

John G. Smith

PEPF81 · KINPF22 · KINPF81 · KINPP12 · PEPF81AD · KINPP4 · PHYSED · PEPF70AB · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.9

The decision

Only take him for a low-effort PE hours class and double-check every requirement yourself; avoid if .

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy PE creditDisorganized late careerShow up for hoursPolarizing reviewsInconsistent communication
  • Older , and an easy fitness A
  • Later reviews slam forgetfulness, changing requirements, and poor communication
  • Grade is often easy if you complete hours and if

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Students report A and A+ by completing workout hours, cards, and basic lectures despite chaos.

.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

86/100

show up, log hours, and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

You must complete weekly hours and often attend lectures, so .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Early fans love him, but multiple later .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Reported grades are high when hours and panned.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

78/100

Main work is gym hours, a strength card, short lectures, and simple assignments.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

, but newer ones describe confusion, rigidity, and poor planning.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Grade hinges on completed workout hours, assignment sign-offs, and a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person fitness and PE courses centered on workout hours, strength cards, and light lecture requirements.

Main concern

Inconsistent instructions and last-minute requirement changes.

What students said

“ ! At the beginning of the semester it was a class of 25. On the last day of class 1211, there were only 6 enrolled.”
KINPP12
“Do the hours, assignments, 9 1-hour lectures, and get an A.”
PEPF81
“Requirements for assignments and the ”
KINPP4

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly hours and notes.

Light final from notesHours-based gradeAssignment sign-offs

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and cards first, with a .

Hours completionStrength exercise cardFinal from notes
“just show up and ”
PEPF70AB
“Do the hours, assignments, 9 1-hour lectures, and get an A.”
PEPF81

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“KINPP12 wJohn Smith was awful! Dr. Smith SHOULD have made fall 2014 his last semester.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 in-person reviews, highlighting easy PE credit versus late-career disorganization. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Recent Experience

42/100

“He is forgetful, inconsistent, and rigid. !”

🅰️ Easy Credit Path

82/100

“Do the hours, assignments, 9 1-hour lectures, and get an A.”

⚠️ Communication Gaps

40/100

“changing hours and requirements without communicating the information to the students well”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • always willing to answer questions
  • a
  • full of comebacks, and a bright sense of humor

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • His class isn't too difficult, just show up
  • Show up to class and do the hours needed every week
  • get an A

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • Epic fail in
  • Requirements for assignments and the

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews span 2004-2015 with a clear old-positive versus new-negative split, lowering consistency.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

PEPF81AD3 reviews
KINPF812 reviews
KINPF221 review
KINPP121 review
KINPP41 review
Show 3 more courses
PEPF70AB1 review
PEPF811 review
PHYSED1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values