AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

John Gotti

PHIL11 · PHIL12 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you want a serious, fair philosophy class and will put in the work; if you need handouts or an easy A.

Best fit · Effort For RewardKnows his stuffFair but strictPassionate lecturerEffort equals gradeExams mismatch lectures
  • Thorough, passionate philosophy teacher who rewards real effort
  • Not an easy A; grades reflect work and he rejects excuses
  • Some students struggle because

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Students say grades track effort and it is not an easy A, with fair but .

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Logic and proofs are hard for many, though one intro class felt manageable with reading and homework.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

; others give little detail, so as expected.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Strong praise for knowledge and fairness is mixed with exam-mismatch .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Students call him fair and equal, with grades matching effort rather than .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

as super crazy in places, and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

75/100

He is praised as thorough, passionate, and clear, though .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and quizzes all matter; one intro path stresses book and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person philosophy courses with strong content mastery and fairness, but and .

Main concern

Tests and , so some students underperform despite clear lectures.

What students said

“ . KNOWS WHAT HE'S TALKING ABOUT! EXTREMELY THOROUGH!”
PHIL12
“Not an Easy A. Its a "get what you put in grade" , the way it should be”
PHIL12
“his tests and teaching in class”
PHIL12

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and , but several students say they differ from class teaching.

In-person examsQuizzesExam content may differ from lectures

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quizzes; some students report mismatch with lecture content.

In-person examsQuizzesLecture-exam mismatch
“The taught”
PHIL12
“his tests and teaching in class”
PHIL12

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . KNOWS WHAT HE'S TALKING ABOUT! EXTREMELY THOROUGH!”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews, highlighting teaching strength, effort-based grades, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

75/100

“Awesome! KNOWS HIS STUFF. EXTREMELY PASSIONATE.”

⚖️ Effort-Based Grades

38/100

“Not an Easy A. Its a "get what you put in grade" , the way it should be #logic”

📝

40/100

“his tests and teaching in class”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • KNOWS WHAT HE'S TALKING ABOUT! EXTREMELY THOROUGH!
  • EXTREMELY PASSIONATE
  • Gotti made the class interesting

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Your grade reflects your effort, straight up
  • Not an Easy A
  • Pay attention, read the book and do the

Theme 3

⚠️ About Exams

  • The taught
  • tests and teaching
  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Five detailed in-person reviews from 2014-2015 show consistent themes, but the sample is small and dated.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL124 reviews
PHIL111 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values