AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Mark Shively

PHIL11 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you can; one dated review shows a polite instructor whose class goes downhill after the midterm.

Best fit · Effort For RewardBoring After MidtermNice But SkipGroup Work EarlyHeavy Lecture Later
  • Class starts engaging with group work then turns into pure lecture.
  • Material becomes painfully boring and .
  • He is courteous, but students would pick a different professor.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Student earned a C in a difficulty-4 course with no signs of free or easy grades.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Rated difficulty 4 with material described as painfully boring and hard to stay engaged with.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

as mandatory, but participation fell sharply after the midterm.

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Student would probably pick a different professor despite finding him nice.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Only grade reported is a C with no mention of .

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

extreme homework load.

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Nice and courteous, but lectures turned boring and lost the .

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Midterm and group work both matter; later focus shifts to pure lecture.

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person PHIL11 started with fun group work, then became all lecture on boring material with falling participation.

Main concern

and motivation.

What students said

“after the and was now 100% lecture on painfully boring material”
PHIL11

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

A , but format and .

Midterm

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Midterm is referenced without open-book, proctoring, or .

Midterm
“after the and was now 100% lecture on painfully boring material”
PHIL11

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ but I'd probably pick a different professor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting engagement drop and . Credibility rating: Low.

📉

32/100

“after the and was now 100% lecture on painfully boring material”

🙂 Nice Personality

50/100

“ but I'd probably pick a different professor.”

👎 Recommendation

32/100

“I'd probably pick a different professor.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Semester started out well enough and he would regularly have us team up for
  • after the and was now 100% lecture on painfully boring material

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • but I'd probably pick a different professor.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one review from 2014 with moderate detail and no corroborating opinions.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL111 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values