AI Rate Professor

Science

Asma Said

ASTR1 · ASTRO1 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

; students say lectures are hard to understand and offer little help with confusion.

Best fit · Self Taught ProThick AccentUnorganizedHard to FollowLow Class AveragesNot Recommended
  • Both reviews rate quality at 1 and emphasize a thick accent that blocks understanding.
  • Students report disorganization, projector issues, and an F class average on the first test.
  • One student dropped and the other called passing a miracle with a B-.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

One student dropped and the other barely passed with a B- after an F class average on the first test.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Astronomy felt harder than expected because lectures were hard to understand and support was weak.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

Both students strongly advise against taking her due to accent barriers and poor organization.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

An F class average on the first test and a .

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Reviews focus on , so workload intensity is unclear but .

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Students cannot understand lectures, say she does not help with confusion, and report projector and organization problems.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Students emphasize test performance and a first-test class average of F more than assignments.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person astronomy students both describe severe communication barriers from a thick accent plus poor organization and unhelpful responses to confusion.

Main concern

Accent and disorganization make lectures nearly unusable and .

What students said

“Her accent is ridiculously thick making it very difficult to understand anything she teaches.”
ASTR1
“Class . I do not recommend this professor at all.”
ASTRO1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Limited evidence points to difficult in-person tests with very low class averages rather than student-friendly formats.

In-Person TestsLow Class Average

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

an F class average on the first test.

In-Person TestsLow Class Average
“Class .”
ASTRO1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 consistently negative in-person reviews. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“Her accent is ridiculously thick making it very difficult to understand anything she teaches.”

📉

20/100

“Class .”

👎 Recommendation Rate

10/100

“ . .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her accent is ridiculously thick making it very difficult to understand anything she teaches.
  • and half the time can't figure out how to work the projector system for her lecture.
  • She does not help with confusion of the material.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Class .
  • It's a miracle i passes this class
  • This could have been easier with a better teacher.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Recommendation

  • .
  • .
  • I was really looking forward to taking an Astronomy class and then I got stuck with this teacher.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two same-year negative reviews with consistent complaints but tiny sample size, so credibility is low.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ASTR11 review
ASTRO11 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1