AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Debbie Chow

ADN21B · ADN1 · ADN22A · ADN31B · ADN22B · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Avoid if you need strong lectures or reliable admin support; only consider if you already master care plans and clinical assessment on your own.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerWeak lecturesStrict care plansFavoritism concernsAdministrative follow-through issuesTough clinical standards
  • Lectures are widely disliked; students say just read the text instead.
  • Clinical and care-plan expectations are strict and detail-heavy.
  • delayed roster submission .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Strict congruent care plans, accurate pathophys, and .

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Clinical skills, prioritization of nursing diagnoses, and detailed care plans raise content difficulty even when lecture quality is low.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

Reviews do not clearly state attendance rules for lecture versus clinical.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

Weak lectures, favoritism, and a critical roster delay that blocked RN licensing drive students away.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Care plans must be fully congruent and clinical assessments must match hers exactly.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Heavy care-plan work, pathophys detail, charting checks, med checks, and clinical performance load.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Lectures are called weak or monotone; one sub experience praises care-plan help, but .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Clinical assessments, care plans, and charting weigh heavily alongside limited lecture value.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Mostly negative in-person nursing experience: , and a serious roster-follow-through failure.

Main concern

Administrative delays and .

What students said

“The entire class is unable because she has not followed through. It is two .”
ADN31B
“she sucks @ it. Just rd the text.”
ADN21B
“She the type that def' picks fav's (watch out loners....ur her target)”
ADN22A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize clinical and care-plan accuracy .

Care plan congruenceClinical assessment matchPathophys detail

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and matching her independent patient assessments.

Care plansClinical assessmentCharting checks
“know how to prioritize nsg diagnosis. All assmts, nsg dx's, r/t's, and int's must be congruent.”
ADN21B
“Make sure you assess your patient accurately b/c she'll go in and perform her own assessment.”
ADN22B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The entire class is unable because she has not followed through. It is two .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person nursing reviews spanning 2005-2013, weighted toward clinical rigor and serious admin failure. Credibility rating: Low.

🚨 Admin Reliability

10/100

“The entire class is unable because she has not followed through. It is two .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“she sucks @ it. Just rd the text.”

⚖️ Clinical Standards

35/100

“Make sure your assessment matches her's!!!!!!!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she sucks @ it. Just rd the text.
  • She's got a total pokerface and monotone voice so you totally can't read her.
  • Had her as a sub once. Very good with careplans.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • All assmts, nsg dx's, r/t's, and int's must be congruent.
  • Pathophys needs to be nailed down with her.
  • Make sure your assessment matches her's!!!!!!!!

Theme 3

⚠️ About Fairness and Follow-Through

  • She the type that def' picks fav's (watch out loners....ur her target)
  • The entire class is unable because she has not followed through.
  • We have all graduated and are not able to become registered nurses because of her inability to follow through.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

40/100

Evidence confidence

Five sparse older reviews from 2005-2013 include one empty comment and mixed detail, so overall confidence stays low.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ADN11 review
ADN21B1 review
ADN22A1 review
ADN22B1 review
ADN31B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values