AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Leslie Heber

CBISCOMP · COSA50 · CAOTC31A · BCOM270 · WINDOWSBEG · WEBDSGN211AD · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

Avoid this instructor unless and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedNo CommunicationBroken Course SiteAvoid At All CostsDelayed Grades
  • Most students report missing grades, dead websites, and ignored emails.
  • Course logistics fail so often that finishing work becomes guesswork.
  • One softer review notes care and open-book tests, but still flags weak organization.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Difficulty ratings are low, but missing grades and broken submission systems make earning and confirming an A unreliable.

; several comments still describe online course logistics.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

Content difficulty is repeatedly rated low, while frustration comes from course management rather than hard material.

; several comments still describe online course logistics.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly prove an and focus on website and .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

, and question how she is allowed to teach.

; several comments still describe online course logistics.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

28/100

grades go unposted for weeks and work cannot be submitted reliably.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

62/100

Material seems light, but disorganization and last-minute due-date chaos create avoidable stress.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

Across years, students report non-updating sites, ignored contact, and failed course administration.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assignments, quizzes, and finals are mentioned, but delivery and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Tagged in-person reviews mostly describe broken course websites, missing grades, and but .

Main concern

Students sit in the dark on grades, due dates, and site outages for long stretches.

What students said

“ .”
BCOM270
“Instructor never updates the web site for the online class.”
WINDOWSBEG
“ but cares about her students much.”
COSA50
“website does not ”
CAOTC31A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

One review notes occasional open-book testing, while and dead sites rather than strict proctoring.

Occasional Open Book Testing

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and late or missing finals, not Lockdown Browser or webcam proctoring.

Occasional Open Book TestingMissing FinalsBroken Course Site
“She offers occasional open book testing and .”
COSA50
“we are still waiting for her to post the and update the assigment calendar.”
WINDOWSBEG

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Horrible teacher. Took this online, and she didn't post one grade in the span of the 8 weeks we took the class, so nobody knows how they did. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews counted as and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“How Ms. Heber is still allowed to teach, I have no idea. .”

🖥️ Course Site Failures

10/100

“website does not function, teacher does not reply to questions, ”

📭 No Communication

15/100

“She never answers emails or phone calls.”

💛 Rare Positive Note

55/100

“ but cares about her students much.”

Theme 1

🖥️ About Course Logistics

  • Instructor never updates the web site
  • website was NEVER updated

Theme 2

📉 About Grades and Feedback

  • she didn't post one grade in the span of the 8 weeks
  • grades have still not been updated
  • still waiting for her to post the

Theme 3

❤️ About Character and Care

  • cares about her students much
  • offers plenty of help during class time
  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

60/100

Evidence confidence

Six mostly negative reviews from 2005-2013 are detailed and consistent on logistics failures, though older.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

BCOM2701 review
CAOTC31A1 review
CBISCOMP1 review
COSA501 review
WEBDSGN211AD1 review
Show 1 more courses
WINDOWSBEG1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values