AI Rate Professor

Film

Janice Quinn-Weyant

FFILM · FILM01 · FILM1ONLINE · FILM · FILM1 · FILMI · FILMONLI · 32 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Avoid unless you need the course and while writing exactly to her prompts.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHarsh Online CriticExact-Keyword GraderConfusing PromptsHigh Writing LoadPolarizing Film Instructor
  • Many students call her mean, condescending, and .
  • Film 1 work centers on watching films and long written posts with strict direction-following.
  • Some students still report easy B or A grades if they parrot prompts and stay on time.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Some students get A or B by following directions and doing all posts, but .

; many narratives still describe online Film work.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content is film viewing plus short posts and , though prompts feel abstract to some.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

80/100

Reviews focus on online-style posts and .

; many discuss online delivery.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

A large share of reviews explicitly because of tone, clarity, and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Students unless answers match her wording and can feel combative in feedback.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Regular film posts and writing are required throughout the term, with some calling the load heavy.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Praise for helpfulness exists, but many stronger , and little teaching value.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

and film responses drive the grade more than occasional multiple-choice midterms and finals.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Despite many comments about online Film 1, all tagged reviews are in person and , and frequent frustration with tone.

Main concern

and unclear expectations dominate the experience for many students.

What students said

“do not take her online class or regular class because ”
FILM1
“She is aggressive, negative (all the time), depressing, condescending”
FILM1
“If you do not say EXACTLY what she said in your answers, she marks you down”
FILM1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, though practice questions sometimes fail to match the .

Multiple Choice Midterm/FinalCommon Sense TestsPractice Questions Misaligned

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students mention multiple-choice midterms and .

Multiple Choice Midterm/FinalCommon Sense Tests
“ ”
FILM1
“She posted completely useless practice questions . Those questions have nothing to do with the ”
FFILM

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is aggressive, negative (all the time), depressing, condescending, brutally combative with the work you do.”

Voice snapshots generated from 32 in-person tagged reviews with high detail and mixed but mostly negative themes. Credibility rating: High.

😠 Teaching Tone

30/100

“She is the meanest woman in the school!”

📝

32/100

“She does not want students, she wants parrots.”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

28/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • belittled you with her comments
  • seems a little pretentious

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • it is an easy A
  • Just do ALL the
  • I did everything she asked of me and then some and she still failed me

Theme 3

📝 About Assignments

  • requires ALOT of writing
  • Include examples in your responses
  • write exactly what the textbook says

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

32

Recent reviews read by the AI

32

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-two detailed reviews across several years show a consistent negative tone with enough positives to map the real tradeoffs.

Inside 32 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 56
3 out of 54
2 out of 58
1 out of 59

Course coverage

FILM123 reviews
FILM2 reviews
FILM012 reviews
FILM1ONLINE2 reviews
FFILM1 review
Show 2 more courses
FILMI1 review
FILMONLI1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values