AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Mohammad Rahnavard

MATH40 · MATH60 · STAT1 · STATSTAT · MCS0260 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
1.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.8

The decision

Avoid unless you already know the material and can teach yourself from the book.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHeavy accentReads from bookTough graderTons of homeworkHard to understand
  • Students cannot understand lectures due to accent and book-reading style.
  • Tests demand every step; .
  • , and high drop rates with zero praise for teaching.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

, and tons of homework mean an A requires heavy self-study and perfect process.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Difficulty ratings near 5 and content.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

He yells if you talk in class and half the class dropped, implying controlled classroom .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

Every review calls him among the and says you must learn entirely on your own.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students report points off for missing steps even with correct answers and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Tons of homework and lectures.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

, and inability to answer questions dominate all reviews.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

75/100

Tests and , alongside heavy homework.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person math and stats sections are described as unintelligible lectures, heavy homework, and .

Main concern

Accent and book-reading make lectures useless, while correct.

What students said

“Sadly this teacher has the heaviest accent that makes is too difficults to listen to.”
MATH40
“ if you get the answer right, but solved it wrong by not doing all the DAMN steps!”
MCS0260
“He reads directly from the text, which we can do ourselves, and .”
STAT1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as weird and strict on process, with .

Step-by-step gradingConfusing testsNo study guide

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; students say he does not say what is on the test and grading is process-harsh.

Step-by-step gradingConfusing testsNo study guide
“ if you get the answer right, but solved it wrong by not doing all the DAMN steps!”
MCS0260
“doesnt tell you whats on the and .”
MATH60

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Overall... the ...”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

💥 Teaching Quality

12/100

“He reads directly from the text, which we can do ourselves, and .”

⚖️

18/100

“ if you get the answer right, but solved it wrong by not doing all the DAMN steps!”

📚

25/100

“If you want to get a good grade in his class you'd have to do ALL the work by yourself.”

🚫 Avoid

10/100

“ you solve problems.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Sadly this teacher has the heaviest accent that makes is too difficults to listen to.
  • All he does is read from the book with his monotone voice
  • He reads directly from the text, which we can do ourselves, and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • TONS of hw too.
  • and .
  • how do you get an F if all the answers were correct!!!!!!!!

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • I've talked to him a few times, and he isn't a bad person. He's just a terrible professor
  • yells at you if you talk in class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Five consistent negative reviews across math and stats from 2010-2012 with detailed shared themes but small sample.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH401 review
MATH601 review
MCS02601 review
STAT11 review
STATSTAT1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values