AI Rate Professor

Food & Nutrition

Ruthe Walsh

FN252 · FNFN · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

evidence is thin and split between easy A and unprofessional neglect.

Best fit · DependsPolarizingMandatory AttendanceEasy A ClaimHelp UnevenSmall Sample
  • Only two reviews exist and they sharply contradict each other.
  • One student calls it an easy A with .
  • Another dropped after feeling ignored and unhelped for a long class.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

72/100

One review explicitly calls it an easy A, but the second review never finished and felt unsupported.

All ; no online reviews were available.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Difficulty ratings are mixed but the positive review frames content as clear and easy beyond slow directions.

All ; no online reviews were available.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

The .

All ; no online reviews were available.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

40/100

One student is positive while another dropped after feeling ignored, so recommendation is highly personal.

All ; no online reviews were available.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

One student reports an easy A, but there is no broader grade evidence.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

, though a long class and mandatory attendance raise time cost.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

Clarity and ease for one student clash with ignored help requests and a .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not and general coursework.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

one easy A with .

Main concern

Help may feel uneven in .

What students said

“Easy "A". .”
FN252
“It was frustrating when I asked for her help, she would help others,ignoring my requests.”
FNFN

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy "A". . Ruthe can be a little slow explaining directions, but other than that .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 conflicting in-person reviews with limited detail. Credibility rating: Low.

🅰️ Easy A Claim

72/100

“Easy "A". .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“Staff was not able to teach me anything.”

📅

18/100

“ .”

⚠️ Support Access

25/100

“when I asked for her help, she would help others,ignoring my requests.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy "A".
  • Ruthe can be a little slow explaining directions, but other than that .

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Support

  • Staff was not able to teach me anything.
  • This was a 3 1/2 hr class & I never got her help!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two conflicting 2012 in-person reviews provide too little consistent detail for high confidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

FN2521 review
FNFN1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values