AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Darleen Peters

ADN21 · ADN21B · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.7

The decision

if you want a tough clinical mentor who makes you earn your grade and actually learn.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerMemorable Clinical InstructorHard Med-Surg PushInconsistent Care PlansMakes You Earn ItSupportive but Demanding
  • Clinical nursing instructor who pushes students hard on med-surg and psych rotations.
  • Students remember her for trust and real learning, not for easy grades.
  • Care-plan grading can feel inconsistent with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Students say they had to work hard for the grade, especially on med-surg care plans.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Med-surg push and high difficulty ratings show the content and clinical load are tough.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

Most students value her as a memorable instructor who taught them a lot despite the hard work.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Care plans can earn marginals, and as .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students repeatedly describe difficult med-surg push and needing to work hard for the grade.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

Students call her memorable and say they learned a .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Care plans and clinical performance drive .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person clinical nursing rotations feel demanding and memorable, with strong learning but .

Main concern

Care-plan expectations and .

What students said

“I was made to work for my grade. I have silently thanked Darleen for years for her trust and recognition of me.”
ADN21
“Med-surg push was really really difficult but I feel like i learned a lot from her.”
ADN21B
“care plan grading is inconsistent and includes.”
ADN21B

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on care-plan .

Care PlansClinical Evaluation

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Assessment centers on care plans and clinical work, with inconsistent care-plan expectations.

Care PlansClinical Evaluation
“your care plans must be on the mark for med surg push. She does give marginals for poor care plans.”
ADN21B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I was made to work for my grade. I have silently thanked Darleen for years for her trust and recognition of me.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person nursing reviews, highlighting clinical rigor and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Impact

70/100

“Darleen was one of my most memorable instructors.”

📚 Hard but

62/100

“Med-surg push was really really difficult but I feel like i learned a lot from her.”

⚖️

35/100

“care plan grading is inconsistent and includes.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • one of my most memorable instructors
  • She made mental health the
  • She didn't make things easy which was good

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I was made to work for my grade
  • Med-surg push was really really difficult
  • she does give marginals for poor care plans

Theme 3

⚠️ About Expectations

  • includes
  • if you shine in the begining you sail through

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only three old in-person reviews from 2007-2012 with mixed detail and no grade or .

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ADN21B2 reviews
ADN211 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values