AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Lesli Shimshim

ESL33X · ESL65 · ESL33 · ESL54 · ESL3395 · ESL34X · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Avoid unless you only need a simple formula-driven ESL grade and can ignore weak teaching.

Best fit · Easy A HunterPoor TeachingFormulaic WritingConfusing QuestionsPolarizingMicromanaging
  • and forced formulaic writing.
  • Students say simple formula sentences earn As while original ideas are punished.
  • Older reviews are more positive, so experiences appear inconsistent over time.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Several students say simple elementary-style sentences get an A if you follow her exact instructions.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content itself is not advanced, but and rigid writing rules make the experience hard.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

One positive note says she was not strict about lateness, but .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most detailed and frustrating class control.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

Simple formula writing is rewarded, but independent writing and mistakes can still lead to low grades or drops.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Work centers on writing under her rules with frequent classroom checking rather than a .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

, and hard to understand despite a few early praise posts.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment focus is writing products and in-class .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

and writing tightly controlled.

Main concern

and forced simple writing block real learning for stronger students.

What students said

“ , but horrible at teaching.”
ESL34X
“ !!”
ESL3395
“nobody could understand her.”
ESL33X

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do and mainly describe writing-based assessment.

Writing-Focused AssessmentLimited Exam Detail

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments emphasize controlled .

Writing-Focused Assessment
“If you write simple sentence you will get an A.”
ESL34X
“she walk around the computer checking error”
ESL3395

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , but horrible at teaching.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 in-person ESL reviews, emphasizing teaching complaints and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“ , but horrible at teaching.”

✍️ Forced Simple Writing

78/100

“If you are stupid,follow her instructions and write a simple sentence like in elementary shool then you will get an A.”

👎 Recommendation Risk

28/100

“ !!”

❓

30/100

“nobody could understand her.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • horrible at teaching
  • nobody could understand her
  • and easy to understand

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you write simple sentence you will get an A
  • because i recieve 2 C's
  • esay to understand what she says and funny class

Theme 3

✍️ About Writing Control

  • she wont let you write you own ideas
  • She expects that you will write what she have said
  • what do u learn today

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

but also some positive outliers, so reliability is moderate.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ESL543 reviews
ESL34X2 reviews
ESL331 review
ESL33951 review
ESL33X1 review
Show 1 more courses
ESL651 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values