Julianna Edlund

FUNDAMENTALS · FUNDEMENTALS · INTERIORDESIGN · ID1 · ID90 · CLRTHRY · HISTORY · HISTORYOFINT · IDID · ID30 · ID50 · INTROTOINTER · ALL · COLORTHEORY · INT101 · IDALL · ID80 · 28 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 14/100
RMP rating: 1.7/5
Take again: —
Difficulty: 4.1

The decision

if you have any alternative professor in interior design.

Best fit · Self Taught ProRude and UnprofessionalHeavy ProjectsFavoritismHarsh CriticAvoid If Possible

Students overwhelmingly describe her as rude, judgmental, and unhelpful.
Workloads are heavy with picky project standards and last-minute changes.
Favoritism and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even strong work can yield low grades amid picky standards and alleged favoritism.

All evidence is from in-person reviews only.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

, and last-minute demands make the content feel hard.

All evidence is from in-person reviews only.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

, but heavy group work and short deadlines pressure presence.

All evidence is from in-person reviews only.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Nearly every detailed review .

All evidence is from in-person reviews only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Picky scoring, favoritism claims, and perfect work still getting Cs appear often.

Format shift

All evidence is from in-person reviews only.

Workload

Overwhelming

16/100

, and material-hunting dominate.

Format shift

All evidence is from in-person reviews only.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students say she lectures little, shows old videos, and talks down instead of teaching.

Format shift

All evidence is from in-person reviews only.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Semester projects, notebooks, midterms, and finals all matter without clear single focus.

Format shift

All evidence is from in-person reviews only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

28 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person design classes are widely called rude, high-workload, and low on real teaching value.

Main concern

Harsh tone, favoritism, and .

What students said

“rude, disrespectful, and unprofessional.”
ID1

“ .”
ID1

“To summarize, she is a bad teacher. She hardly lectures, she is not approachable for ”
ID90

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are manageable if you read, but overall assessment .

Book-Based TestsNotebook EntriesProject-Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and finals are fairly standard if the book and notebook work are done.

Book-Based TestsNotebook Entries

“midterm and if you read the book and look over assigned notebook entries.”
ID80

“really hard technical tests, impossible to items for resourse file and .”
ID50

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“ ! and money.”
Voice snapshots generated from 28 in-person reviews, highlighting toxicity, workload, and teaching gaps. Credibility rating: High.

💥 Teaching Disaster

18/100

“One of the most awful teachers ever! It is sad to see her as the head of the interior design program.”

🚫 Recommendation

12/100

“ !!”

📚 Workload Crush

16/100

“She pours very heavy (back to back) workloads on you and shows major favoritism.”

Theme 1

😠 About Character

rude, disrespectful, and unprofessional
she degrades her students
Very rude and judgemental, and has a severe attitude

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

If you want to pass her class just make sure you bring her gifts in return for grades
Ton of

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

she would rather show 2 hour videos and put you in groups than teach
she doesn't teach, she just puts on 50 year old videos
she'll never show you how to do it and seh never helps you

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-eight mostly detailed in-person reviews show strong negative consistency across years and courses.

Inside 28 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51

4 out of 51

3 out of 54

2 out of 511

1 out of 511

Course coverage

ID15 reviews

INTERIORDESIGN3 reviews

COLORTHEORY2 reviews

FUNDEMENTALS2 reviews

HISTORY2 reviews

Show 12 more courses

ID302 reviews

ID502 reviews

ALL1 review

CLRTHRY1 review

FUNDAMENTALS1 review

HISTORYOFINT1 review

ID801 review

ID901 review

IDALL1 review

IDID1 review

INT1011 review

INTROTOINTER1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

A 2

B range

No reported values

C range

No reported values

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

Not_Sure_Yet 1 · Rather_Not_Say 1

Julianna Edlund

x x if you have any alternative professor in interior design.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

HardWork

Challenging

Varies

Avoid

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

💥 Teaching Disaster

🚫 Recommendation

📚 Workload Crush

😠 About Character

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

if you have any alternative professor in interior design.