AI Rate Professor

Architecture

Brent Sears

ARCHT6162 · ARCHT70AB · ARCH62 · ARCH64 · ARCH61201 · ARCHT · ARCHT64 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you can learn independently and chase his preferred details without much day-to-day assistance.

Best fit · Self Taught ProReal-world knowledgeLimited one-on-oneHeavy assignment loadMixed claritySelf-driven studio
  • Mixed 3.3 quality with split opinions on helpfulness versus real-world content
  • Budget-driven multi-class teaching reduces individual attention
  • Works better for self-sufficient students who can chase details themselves

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Heavy work without reliable assistance makes high grades hard unless you already know the details he prefers.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Difficulty sits mid-range; content is manageable for some and tough when support is thin.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

44/100

and real-world knowledge; others find him unhelpful under heavy load.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

No strong leniency claims; success hinges on matching his preferred details.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Multiple comments cite loads of work with limited help.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

, but stretched thin across simultaneous classes.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Architecture studio and project work dominate comments.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Architecture studio with real-world content but uneven help and heavy work when he is stretched across classes.

Main concern

Limited one-on-one time and heavy workload without consistent assistance.

What students said

“He is better one on one, I have learned a great deal from him. the biggest problem is that with the school budget, he has to teach 3 classes simultaneously, so the one on one time is lacking.”
ARCH64
“Class is only easy if someone assists you, he only gives out loads of work and dosent assist thus failing. Not very helpfull.”
ARCHT
“ .”
ARCH62

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on project details and workload rather than a .

Project-based workDetail-focused expectations

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; formal exam policy not clearly described.

Project loadDetail preferencesLimited assistance
“Good instructor but you have to make sure you get the details he perfers down”
ARCH64
“he only gives out loads of work and dosent assist thus failing.”
ARCHT

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Class is only easy if someone assists you, he only gives out loads of work and dosent assist thus failing. Not very helpfull.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 in-person reviews with limited comment detail, highlighting mixed support and project load. Credibility rating: Low.

🛠️ Real-World Content

60/100

“His content is real world knowledge and experience.”

⏱️ Attention Bottleneck

35/100

“he has to teach 3 classes simultaneously, so the one on one time is lacking.”

📦 Heavy Workload

32/100

“he only gives out loads of work and dosent assist thus failing.”

📋 Clarity When Present

55/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is better one on one, I have learned a great deal from him.
  • .
  • Good instructor but you have to make sure you get the details he perfers down

Theme 2

⚠️ About Support Gaps

  • the one on one time is lacking.
  • Not very helpfull.
  • Class is only easy if someone assists you

Theme 3

📈 About Workload

  • loads of work
  • His content is real world knowledge and experience.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Eight mostly older reviews with half empty comments and mixed quality ratings reduce confidence.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ARCH642 reviews
ARCH612011 review
ARCH621 review
ARCHT1 review
ARCHT61621 review
Show 2 more courses
ARCHT641 review
ARCHT70AB1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values