AI Rate Professor

Counseling

Margaret Palomares

COUNSCONS · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid unless you have no other option; the only review is extremely negative.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHostile personalityExtremely difficultSingle harsh reviewAvoidOld feedback
  • .
  • Quality rated 1/5 with max difficulty 5/5.
  • .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Difficulty is maxed at 5 and the only comment is pure hostility with no path to an easy grade.

Evidence ; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

Rated 5/5 difficulty with zero comments suggesting approachable content.

Evidence ; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

review.

Evidence ; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

The sole student calls her a horrible person and gives the lowest quality score.

Evidence ; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

No grade data, but max difficulty and a hostile review imply unforgiving evaluation.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

No workload details given, but extreme difficulty rating suggests a demanding class.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

One student summed the entire experience as dealing with a horrible person.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Single old review labels her a horrible person with rock-bottom quality and max difficulty.

Main concern

Hostile personal tone with no redeeming teaching detail.

What students said

“Horrible person!”
COUNSCONS

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

.

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews do .

“Horrible person!”
COUNSCONS

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Horrible person!”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting hostility and low quality. Credibility rating: Low.

💔 Teaching Quality

10/100

“Horrible person!”

🚫 Recommendation

8/100

“Horrible person!”

🔥 Course Difficulty

12/100

“Horrible person!”

Theme 1

😠 About Character

  • Horrible person!

Theme 2

📉 About Overall Experience

  • Horrible person!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

Only one sparse 2011 review with no grade, tags, or concrete course detail.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

COUNSCONS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values