AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Melissa Ysais

CD47 · CDECE58 · CDECE47 · HUD107 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.5

The decision

if you want a manageable Child Development class and will follow the syllabus; skip if you need polished lectures.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHit or MissPassionate About ChildrenSyllabus-DrivenEasy if You Show UpReal-Life Examples
  • Most students find the class easy if they read the syllabus and show up.
  • One strong negative review calls her off-topic and self-focused.
  • She uses real-life examples and expects effort, not busywork.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Low difficulty ratings and comments say showing up, reading, and doing relevant work yields a solid grade.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

; intellectual load is light for most students.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly state a pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Three reviews urge taking her and , so the fit depends on tolerance for lecture style.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Students say relevant assignments and following the syllabus lead to easy passes and at least a B.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Workload

Light

78/100

Work is described as relevant rather than busywork, with book reading and notes as the main load.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

Many call her great and passionate, but one detailed review calls her the .

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Comments emphasize syllabus work, book reading, and .

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students mostly praise her passion and off-topic personal talk.

Main concern

Inconsistent lecture quality and occasional off-topic class time.

What students said

“If you show up, read the syllabus, read the ease.”
HUD107
“If you don't pass the class with at least a B you really were wasting your time.”
CDECE58
“ ! Hated every minute of class.”
CDECE47

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews barely describe formal exams and focus on reading and assignments instead.

Syllabus-based workBook-focused learning

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, or closed-book exam rules.

Assignment-heavy course flow
“Everything is on the syllabus.”
HUD107

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you show up, read the syllabus, read the ease.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews spanning 2009-2011. Credibility rating: Medium.

📚 Easy Pass Path

82/100

“If you show up, read the syllabus, read the ease.”

❤️ Passion for Kids

75/100

“She is very passionate about children and it shows in her teaching.”

⚠️ Polarizing Style

40/100

“ ! Hated every minute of class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She gives a lot of real life examples and listens to the students stories.
  • She is fun and busy work.
  • She couldn't pronounce words, got off topic and constantly talked about herself.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • you will pass this class with ease.
  • If you don't pass the class with at least a B you really were wasting your time.
  • Ms. Ysais is a great teacher who expects a lot from her students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

and little grade data lower confidence.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CD471 review
CDECE471 review
CDECE581 review
HUD1071 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values