AI Rate Professor

Design

Paul Wynne

ART3105 · ART41 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid unless the course is required; expect to teach yourself design tools with little support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnhelpfulBurnt OutHarsh on AsSelf-Teach RequiredPolarizing
  • Most students say he is tired, unhelpful, and leaves you to learn tools alone.
  • He reportedly withholds A grades even in intro courses.
  • One strong positive review exists, but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Students say he will not give As in intro work and expects hard effort without much help.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Graphics tools and design standards .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most reviewers call him unhelpful and urge students not to take him when they have a choice.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Multiple comments say he withholds As and grades strictly despite intro-level framing.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Project-based load is real and he dislikes slackers, but volume details are limited.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Dominant theme is burnout, incomprehensible or off-topic talk, and extreme lack of help.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Course centers on design projects and critiques rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, unhelpful instructor who assigns work and expects self-learning, with one glowing exception.

Main concern

Little tool instruction and reluctance to award As can hurt both learning and GPA.

What students said

“ and let you learn on your own.”
ART41
“Will not give out A grades, although it's an intro course.”
ART41
“he is EXTREMELY UNHELPFUL”
ART3105

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment appears project- and critique-based; reviews do .

Project critiquesDesign assignmentsNo clear formal exam policy

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students describe project assignments and critiques rather than formal proctored exams.

Project critiquesDesign assignments
“His saving grace is his critique of .”
ART41
“ and let you learn on your own.”
ART41

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want to learn about computer graphics from .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 , and one strong positive outlier. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

28/100

“he is EXTREMELY UNHELPFUL”

⚖️

22/100

“Will not give out A grades, although it's an intro course.”

🚫 Recommendation

25/100

“He scares students away program. 1/2 class dropped.”

⭐ Positive Outlier

90/100

“this teacher was awesome! I learned so much about the world of graphics and computers from him.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and let you learn on your own.
  • completely incomprehensible, boring
  • He is excellent in clearly outlining the course and !

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Will not give out A grades, although it's an intro course.
  • he does not like slackers!
  • Discriminates against hot shots-won't help novices.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews from 2007-2011 lean strongly negative with one outlier praise, so the but limited.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ART413 reviews
ART31052 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values