AI Rate Professor

Art

Evan Ballinger

ART55 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if and print design instruction from a knowledgeable, helpful instructor.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyAdobe InDesign ExpertClear Software InstructionHelpful With Design ToolsKnowledge SharerHighly Recommended
  • and print design
  • and helps even late students
  • Single strong review strongly recommends him for design software skills

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Difficulty sits mid-range with no grade proof of free As, so an A still needs solid design work and software practice.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Content is software-based design work at moderate difficulty rather than an effortless intro class.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

, though the instructor still helps late students.

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

The sole detailed review strongly recommends him for and .

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

, but grades were not reported so fairness looks average rather than free.

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

, yet mastering InDesign tools implies regular practice.

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Students call him a and good design practice.

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews emphasize software skills and design .

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person ART55 students , and a willing knowledge-sharing style.

Main concern

Only one dated review limits how confidently this experience generalizes.

What students said

“Great teacher. and print.”
ART55
“ and different elements in the software and how it relates to good design. .”
ART55

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring rules.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great teacher. and print. , and seems to have a interest in sharing his vast knowledge with all the students in the class, even the ones that show up late.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review, highlighting teaching clarity and design software help. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“ and different elements in the software and how it relates to good design.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

92/100

“ .”

🧰 Software Expertise

90/100

“ and print.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great teacher.
  • and print.
  • , and seems to have a interest in sharing his vast knowledge

Theme 2

📐 About Design Skills

  • and different elements in the software
  • how it relates to good design
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only one 2011 in-person review exists, so insight is detailed but too thin and old for high confidence.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ART551 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values