AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Daisy Hines

ADN2 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

unless you are fine teaching yourself from notes and slides.

Best fit · Self Taught ProLazy lecturerInappropriate jokesReads slides onlyDoes not care
  • Students say she fakes care and delivers little real teaching.
  • Class time is mostly slide reading that students could do at home.
  • Tone is strongly negative with inappropriate humor called out.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

45/100

No grade outcomes are given, and the review focuses on poor teaching rather than easy or hard A pathways.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Difficulty is rated mid-level, with complaints about delivery rather than extreme content complexity.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

review.

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

The only review calls her a bad, lazy teacher and strongly rejects the class experience.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

.

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Light

68/100

Complaints .

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Students describe fake concern, inappropriate jokes, and reading slides instead of teaching.

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The .

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

as lazy, inappropriate, and low-value in class.

Main concern

Wasted class time and unprofessional tone with almost no useful instruction.

What students said

“SUPER LAZY!!! BAD TEACHER if you would keep us in class you better be sure you have something important to teach us.”
ADN2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews do not .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She'll make you think she care but she dont. very inappropriate jokes. SUPER LAZY!!! BAD TEACHER”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching quality and professionalism. Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Teaching Quality

12/100

“We can read our notes at home, we dont need you to read it for us off of slide show.”

👎 Recommendation

8/100

“SUPER LAZY!!! BAD TEACHER if you would keep us in class you better be sure you have something important to teach us.”

😬 Classroom Tone

15/100

“She'll make you think she care but she dont. very inappropriate jokes.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • We can read our notes at home, we dont need you to read it for us off of slide show.
  • SUPER LAZY!!! BAD TEACHER

Theme 2

😤 About Character

  • She'll make you think she care but she dont.
  • very inappropriate jokes.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

Only one detailed but very old review exists, so confidence in the overall picture is low.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ADN21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values