AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

M Sargent

INTROTOETHICS · PHILIO · PHIL1 · PHILSIX · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid unless you only need a checkbox class and can tolerate boring lectures; most students say they learned nothing.

Best fit · Self Taught ProExtremely BoringConfusing LecturesDo Not TakeSleep-Inducing ClassMixed Easy-A Rumor
  • Students overwhelmingly call lectures boring and .
  • Course difficulty ratings skew high even when a few call content simple.
  • One older review claims an easy A path; most others report barely passing and learning little.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

One review pitches an easy A with multiple choice and , but others barely passed and rated difficulty high.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Average difficulty is high and students repeatedly call the .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

He wants students to show up, yet several note he does not care if you sleep and participation is not strictly forced.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most comments say , and learned nothing, with only one mild easy-A endorsement.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

one easy-A report and , but others barely passed with .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

68/100

Weekly short quizzes, occasional paper, and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Repeated boring and the feedback.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Weekly quizzes, multiple-choice tests, one paper, and a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

as , and hard to sit through, with weak organization on exams.

Main concern

Boredom, confusion, and .

What students said

“This teacher is very boring. He wants you to show up but he is so boring that I always would fall asleep.”
PHILSIX
“Easy teacher, boring but simple. ... Overall if you want a n easy A and do not mind being somewhat bored take the class.”
PHIL1
“ ..he is boring.”
INTROTOETHICS

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; final logistics were poorly managed in one report.

Multiple Choice TestsWeekly QuizzesIn-Person Final

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Multiple-choice tests and weekly quizzes; forgotten.

Multiple ChoiceWeekly QuizzesProjected Final
“ ...”
PHIL1
“for the so he had to project it on to the board”
PHILSIX

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This teacher is very boring. He wants you to show up but he is so boring that I always would fall asleep... Needless to say I learned nothing and barely passed. !”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person reviews spanning 2005-2010, highlighting boredom, confusion, and mixed ease. Credibility rating: Medium.

😴 Extreme Boredom

22/100

“This teacher is very boring. He wants you to show up but he is so boring that I always would fall asleep.”

🚫

22/100

“ ..he is boring.”

🧩

32/100

“confusing and boring :o”

🎯 Occasional Easy A Path

48/100

“Overall if you want a n easy A and do not .”

Theme 1

😴 About Teaching Style

  • This teacher is very boring
  • Nice guy, boring class
  • confusing and boring :o

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy teacher, boring but simple
  • Not that easy, horrible to sit through
  • Needless to say I learned nothing and barely passed

Theme 3

📝 About Assessments

  • You get 1 quiz every wed, but it's only 10 questions
  • for the

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Six detailed-enough in-person reviews from 2005-2010 are consistent on boredom but sparse on grades and .

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

INTROTOETHICS2 reviews
PHIL12 reviews
PHILIO1 review
PHILSIX1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values