AI Rate Professor

Fine Arts

Susan Joseph

ART9 · ART42 · ART46 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid unless you can teach yourself art software; she is widely described as impatient and unclear.

Best fit · Self Taught ProShort temperHard to followWeak software expertiseImpatient with questionsProject-heavy art
  • Two of three reviews call her impatient and .
  • Students report she changed tools mid-course and lacked demonstrable expertise.
  • One older review liked her humor but warned not to push her patience.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Difficulty ratings are high and comments focus on struggle, not free grades.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Software and and tools change mid-course.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly state an .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Dominant tone is disappointing, impatient teaching with little expertise shown.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

, but high difficulty and frustration suggest unforgiving outcomes.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Projects, papers, and a field trip are mentioned; workload is real for art courses.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Students cite short temper, tool switches, and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

, and a field trip rather than formal exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person fine arts with mostly negative experiences: short temper, weak tool demos, and .

Main concern

Impatience and inability to answer technical questions on required software.

What students said

“She has a short temper if u question her.She doesn't have any answers if you ask a question.Disappointing”
ART46
“very impatient and if her life depended on it.”
ART9
“Has a sense of humor, but don't get cocky and push the limits of her patience.”
ART42

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize projects and a .

Project-basedPaperField trip

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Assessment appears project- and paper-based; .

ProjectsPaperField trip
“She assigns work and has you write a paper and go on a field trip during the semester.”
ART42

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She has a short temper if u question her.She doesn't have any answers if you ask a question.Disappointing”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews (2005-2010); low sample size limits confidence. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“She has no work to show her expertise in either program.”

👎 Recommendation

22/100

“very impatient and if her life depended on it.”

⚠️ Classroom Climate

30/100

“She'll get very ticked off if you ask questions about anything”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She only lectured at a visual perspective.
  • She didn't know how to use Animation Master, so after three weeks, she changed the program
  • if her life depended on it.

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • She has a short temper if u question her.
  • She'll get very ticked off if you ask questions about anything
  • Has a sense of humor, but don't get cocky and push the limits of her patience.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

; negative pattern is clear but sample is thin.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ART421 review
ART461 review
ART91 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values