AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Patricia Toliver

CDECE48 · CDECE47 · CDECE1 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Worth considering for Child Development if you want a , but expect limited recent evidence.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring MentorScholarship SupportInteresting ReadingsExam Review HelpfulGuest Lecturers
  • Students remember her kindness and personal support, including scholarship help.
  • Child development content involves substantial reading that .
  • Ratings are mixed and comments are sparse and decades old, so the picture is incomplete.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

One reported A and moderate difficulty scores suggest a fair path to a strong grade with steady work, but grade evidence is thin.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

, but students note substantial reading and mixed difficulty ratings.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

available comments.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

66/100

Positive personal impact and an enjoyable class note outweigh one unexplained low rating in a tiny sample.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

Limited grade data shows at least one A, with .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Students mention a lot of reading load.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Described as , and overall enjoyable when comments exist.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

; assignment weight is not clearly detailed.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

and discussion-driven, with interesting readings and exam review, plus one memorable scholarship letter story.

Main concern

Very old sparse reviews and one low rating without explanation make expectations hard to pin down.

What students said

“There is a lot of reading, but it is interesting and she reviews it before the exams.”
CDECE48
“I took her in 87 and she was so kind as to write me a letter giving me a scholarship”
CDECE1
“She is open to relivent discusions about the development and care of .”
CDECE48

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; proctoring and book policy are not specified.

Exam ReviewIn-Person Class

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, without proctoring details.

Exam Review
“she reviews it before the exams”
CDECE48

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“There is a lot of reading, but it is interesting and she reviews it before the exams.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews spanning 2004-2010; credibility rating: Low.

❤️ Caring Mentor

80/100

“she was so kind as to write me a letter giving me a scholarship”

📚 Reading Load

48/100

“There is a lot of reading, but it is interesting and she reviews it before the exams.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“Over all an enjoyable class!”

Theme 1

❤️ About Character

  • she was so kind as to write me a letter giving me a scholarship
  • Thank You Patricia Toliver, Angel.

Theme 2

📘 About Class Experience

  • There is a lot of reading, but it is interesting
  • She is open to relivent discusions about the development and care of children
  • She also brings in other lecturers to cover topics.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only four reviews from 2004-2010, two with no comments, and limited grade or .

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CDECE472 reviews
CDECE11 review
CDECE481 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values