Nii-Boye Simpson-Rodgers

MATH10 · MATH45 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 16/100
RMP rating: 1.9/5
Take again: —
Difficulty: 4.3

The decision

Avoid unless you already excel at math and have no alternative professor.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerUnclear ExplanationsHard to UnderstandDo Not TakeFrustrating LecturesPoor Board Work

Nearly every detailed MATH45 review calls him unclear and .
Students warn that weaker math backgrounds are unlikely to pass.
One brief MATH10 comment says very good, but the dominant tone is strong avoidance.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Students repeatedly warn confusion and low odds of passing, especially if you are not already strong in math.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

16/100

Comments and high difficulty ratings describe the material and delivery as extremely .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Multiple students explicitly .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

No A-friendly language; students focus on failing risk and frustration rather than grade support.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Workload volume is rarely detailed; the .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

, and unhelpful responses to questions.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews emphasize .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person math sections, especially MATH45, are described as , and demoralizing for most students.

Main concern

and high fail risk if you are not already strong in math.

What students said

“Horrible Explainer & he writes with his feet.... So !”
MATH45

“ . This is the .”
MATH45

“ and in teaching the material.”
MATH45

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; overall assessment feel is high-difficulty and unforgiving due to unclear instruction.

High DifficultyIn-Person Math

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

rules; they stress extreme difficulty and confusion.

High Difficulty

“Chances are you won’t be passing this class =(”
MATH45

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“ . This is the .”
Voice snapshots generated from 7 in-person reviews with highly consistent negative themes; credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Recommendation Rate

12/100

“So !”

😵 Teaching Clarity

18/100

“ ”

📉 Pass Risk

18/100

“For people that aren’t good at math .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

Horrible Explainer & he writes with his feet
and in teaching the material

Theme 2

⚠️ About Difficulty & Warnings

please find a better professor
definitely he has make me hate math

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Seven mostly consistent negative in-person reviews from 2006-2010 give a , though all evidence is old.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50

4 out of 51

3 out of 50

2 out of 55

1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH456 reviews

MATH101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

No reported values

B range

No reported values

C range

No reported values

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

No reported values