AI Rate Professor

Theater

Denis Styjewski

TART1 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

review describing harmful, unsupportive teaching.

Best fit · Self Taught ProNarcissistic InstructorAvoid Theater ClassPoor Grade CommunicationTrauma-Inducing AssignmentsLittle Actual Teaching
  • Single review describes almost no real teaching and heavy self-focus
  • Personal monologue work allegedly harmed students emotionally

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Grades are opaque and performance work appears arbitrary, so an A is not described as accessible.

All .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Only two performance pieces were assigned, but the emotional and instructional burden is high.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

review.

All .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

The only review explicitly says stay away due to poor teaching and harmful assignments.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Instructor reportedly refuses to .

Format shift

All .

Workload

Light

60/100

Only two performance pieces were done all semester, so volume is low.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Review claims class time is spent on the instructor's own stories instead of teaching.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment centers on monologues and performance pieces with little other structure described.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One in-person theater review strongly warns that class time is spent on the instructor rather than teaching.

Main concern

Personal monologues and refusal to discuss grades created a harmful classroom climate.

What students said

“Instructor is Narcissist spends more time talking about what he has done than teahcing.”
TART1
“Stay away, First Monologe had us pull up personal situations.”
TART1
“Won't awnser questions about grades. You don't find out till posting.”
TART1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is performance-based monologues rather than traditional written exams.

Performance PiecesPersonal Monologues

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students complete personal monologues and only two performance pieces across the semester.

Personal MonologuesPerformance Pieces
“Only did two preformance pieces in all of the semster.”
TART1
“First Monologe had us pull up personal situations.”
TART1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Stay away, First Monologe had us pull up personal situations. A couple of students required psyc help after.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 strongly negative in-person review. Credibility rating: Low.

🚫 Recommendation

8/100

“Stay away, First Monologe had us pull up personal situations.”

🎭 Teaching Quality

12/100

“Instructor is Narcissist spends more time talking about what he has done than teahcing.”

📉 Grade Transparency

20/100

“Won't awnser questions about grades. You don't find out till posting.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • spends more time talking about what he has done than teahcing
  • Only did two preformance pieces in all of the semster.

Theme 2

⚠️ About Classroom Harm

  • First Monologe had us pull up personal situations.
  • A couple of students required psyc help after.

Theme 3

📉 About Grades

  • Won't awnser questions about grades.
  • You don't find out till posting.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one strongly negative 2009 review exists, so confidence is low despite vivid detail.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

TART11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values