AI Rate Professor

Floral Design

Roxana Rodriguez

FLORDES · INTRO101 · FLOR760 · FLO286B · FLOR286 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Great for students who love floral design and can handle a strong personality; mixed reviews mean you should not expect a universally soft experience.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerInspirational designerHelpful mentorPolarizing mannerTextbook usedSupply cost concern
  • Several students find her inspiring and excellent for floral design talent discovery.
  • One strong complaint alleges rudeness toward a student with a foreign accent.
  • Course difficulty and vibe vary by section, from easy hobby energy to harder studio work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Difficulty spans easy to hard with , so an A likely still requires real studio effort.

All .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Some rate it easy and joyful while others rate high difficulty, landing near a standard hands-on course.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

All .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Strong inspiration and help for many, but a severe interpersonal complaint and one flat review keep it conditional.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

; student outcomes feel mixed rather than clearly generous or harsh.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Hands-on design, supplies, and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

Many love her ideas and mentoring, but rudeness and unimpressive comments pull the overall teaching experience down.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Comments center on class projects, design practice, and supplies rather than formal exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and talent-building, but tone and difficulty can swing sharply between students.

Main concern

A serious professionalism concern about treatment of non-native English speakers.

What students said

“loved her class! and helped me to discover things and talent within myself”
FLOR286
“she is an amazing person, with such great ideas and ways of viewing life.”
FLOR760
“She is very rude.”
FLORDES

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person floral design reviews .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“loved her class! and helped me to discover things and talent within myself that i never even knew before.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews, highlighting inspiration, studio work, and one serious interpersonal complaint. Credibility rating: Medium.

🌸 Inspiring Floral Mentor

80/100

“she is an amazing person, with such great ideas and ways of viewing life.”

⚠️ Polarizing Classroom Tone

20/100

“She is very rude.”

💡 Talent Discovery

78/100

“helped me to discover things and talent within myself that i never even knew before.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • her teaching techniques are superb
  • she's an inspiration, i loved her
  • It's ok teacher. nothing impress me.

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • She is very rude.
  • once you're in her class, you're happy again

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Supplies

  • the only bad things though is the supply
  • in floral design

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

Five detailed but older reviews show both strong praise and a serious negative claim, limiting certainty.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

FLO286B1 review
FLOR2861 review
FLOR7601 review
FLORDES1 review
INTRO1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values