AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Annalisa Scafidi

201L · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you want a and are ready for test-weighted grading.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyApproachable Lab MentorClear GradingTest-Heavy Lecture ChemFast Email RepliesNew But Enthusiastic
  • Students unanimously rate her 5/5 for , and accessibility in chem lab and lecture.
  • but manageable if absences are communicated early.
  • yet predictable because .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Students earn As and A-minuses by participating fully and preparing for .

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Lab feels friendly, but lecture chem difficulty hits mid-to-high with .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Lab and class attendance are required, with grade risk if .

All four reviews are in person and stress showing up.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Every detailed review recommends her for fairness, teaching clarity, and approachability.

Recommendation evidence is entirely in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

72/100

Students say she grades fairly with and .

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Lab participation and assignments are manageable; , and homework.

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Universal praise for , and fast help in , and office hours.

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

80/100

One lecture section was about 80% exams with quizzes and .

Format shift

In-person only; labs emphasize participation and turn-ins.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

All four in-person reviews describe a sweet, responsive new professor who makes lab feel low-stress while and fair.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“She's so sweet and fun! It's like you're chilling in .”
201L
“be prepared for those exams, as the class is very test-heavy.”
81767
“You are required to go to the if you don't.”
201L

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

but aligned with study guides; and turning work in.

Test heavy lectureExams match study guidesDrop one of four examsLab participation required

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Chem lecture is exam-dominated with fair, guide-aligned tests; .

80% exams in Chem 152Exams same as study guidesDrop 1 of 4 exams
“Chem 152 was based on 80% exams, 10% quizzes, and 10% homework.”
81767
“ as the , so nothing out of the ordinary.”
81767

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's so sweet and fun! It's like you're chilling in . Super approachable and fun to talk to.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews, highlighting approachability, mandatory lab presence, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“Prof. and she teaches things well”

👍 Recommendation

90/100

“I 100% recommend taking her Lab course for Chem 201, , and grades fairly.”

🧪

62/100

“be prepared for those exams, as the class is very test-heavy.”

Theme 1

❤️ About Character

  • She's so sweet and fun
  • always willing to answer questions outside of lab

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • as long as you participate fully and turn in
  • as the
  • You can drop 1 out of the 4 exams

Theme 3

📍

  • You are required to go to the if you don't
  • show up to class for sure

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

and detailed, but the tiny sample limits confidence.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

201L2 reviews
817672 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 3 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values